
Every year around the end of December / beginning of January, I do the same thing: I go back and look at price predictions made by large financial institutions for specific crypto assets.
- Not Twitter influencers
- Not anonymous accounts
- Actual institutions that claim to do “deep research"
This year, I revisited VanEck’s comparison and price outlook for SUI vs Aptos, published as a serious analytical piece.
I’ve also included a screenshot of their price targets so there’s no debate about what was actually stated.
Every year, I am astounded by their confidence level, the way their assumptions are stated as "fundamentals and how their predictions are presented as if they’re grounded in reality
And year after year they are wrong.
If a large financial institution tells you where a crypto price will be at the end of the year, you should treat it as entertainment — not analysis.
TL;DR
I track institutional crypto predictions every year.
VanEck’s SUI & Aptos price targets are just another example of why big names does not equal accurate forecasts.
Here’s the blogpost for reference:
🔗 https://www.vaneck.com/us/en/blogs/digital-assets/sui-vs-aptos-competitive-analysis-and-price-prediction/
Every Year I Check Institutional Crypto Price Predictions. This Is What VanEck Predicted for SUI & Aptos for 2025.
byu/Independent-Pea4562 inCryptoTechnology
Posted by Independent-Pea4562