I hear quite often that government-run businesses are terrible because they have no incentive to be profitable or innovate. The usual argument I hear is that the Soviet Union became a failed state due to state-run industry.

    But it seems to me like there were probably a lot of issues with the Soviet Union. Saying that state-owned businesses don’t work because true Soviet Union failed doesn’t feel like a particularly good argument.

    Are there examples of state run businesses that have innovated or produced profit? OS there economic consensus in whether or not nationalized business can operate successfully?

    Are nationalized businesses generally less profitable and/or innovative?
    byu/Over-Discipline-7303 inAskEconomics



    Posted by Over-Discipline-7303

    Leave A Reply
    Share via