Why aren’t journalists focusing more on the US passing $40 trillion in debt? Even Janet Yellen is warning the debt load is close to tipping point

    National debt
    byu/sometimeswhy ineconomy



    Posted by sometimeswhy

    22 Comments

    1. It’s wild that we are told our entire lives about how debt works and threatened with collections and bankruptcy etc etc. Yet our govt cannot seem to do the same thing.

    2. Parking_Lot_47 on

      The path US debt has been on is kinda old news. And the lack of noticeable consequences so far vs the hyperbolic rhetoric for decades feels to the public like crying wolf.

      And then there’s the people who don’t give af about the debt if it’s to cut taxes for the rich.

    3. “Yellen was overwhelmingly confirmed by the Senate, then was instrumental in pushing Congress to approve $1.9 trillion in Covid relief spending, on top of the historic $4 trillion the government had already authorized.”

      Yellen said a a big reason we are where we are. Hilarious that NOW she is raising the alarm.

    4. Because you can’t win elections running on reducing the national debt. You’ll have to cut spending and programs, with outcries from those getting free stuff. “You’re a racist!” “You hate kids!” “You hate seniors!”

      It’s a non-starter. Onward we go until a financial crisis stops it.

      One bright spot is that maybe all the recent attention to fraud could have a positive impact on reducing spending. Up to $1.5T in fraud a year? We will see how it goes…

    5. The tipping point is servicing the interest on the debt, and gold and silver tells me, they’ve reached that tipping point and that they’ll be resorting to print and spend, otherwise called “quantitative easing”.

    6. If you want to get Obama care subsidies started again no one can act like they are worried about the debt.

    7. Chemical-Ebb6472 on

      My take is that many journalists put significant effort into years of anti-Trump reporting in an attempt to ensure he never takes power again, even after Mitch placed party over country and refused to complete the Trump impeachments using the remedy that our Constitution provided.

      They then saw a majority of the country put him back into power anyway. Even if Musk messed with the vote tallies to put him over the top, it was easy to see that there was a clear, strong, current of support for Trump’s second election from all ages in the US.

      They, like many other professionals (including a good chunk of us in the global finance world who would never provide him credit), warned against the danger a second term for him would bring without the same old school, republican, guardrails that limited him in round 1, to our country (and world), but the people told us to fuck off, liked to watch him dance the jerk on stage, and returned him to office.

      So now they also say fuck it, give the people’s majority what they want – and a normalized Trump is what they wanted.

    8. Because no one in DC cares about the national debt. Everyone would either rather pay less in taxes or spend more.

    9. RaggedMountainMan on

      Because it’s the debt is a wealth transfer from the working class to the capitalist class. Most news media are cheerleaders for the stock market, capitalism, steady inflation, etc.

    10. wrestlingchampo on

      US only cares about the debt when Democrats are in power. Been that way for decades.

    11. Ok-Proposal-4987 on

      It only matters if a Dem is president and the American people are getting help.

      If corporations are making money and the deficit is going up then there is no need to report it.

    12. The biggest chunks of government spending are Social Security (22%), Debt Interest (15%), Medicare (15%), Medicaid and other health care (14%), National Defense (14%), Income Security (8%), Veterans (5%). Everything else is in the remaining 7%. Source [treasury fiscal report by the current administration](https://fiscaldata.treasury.gov/americas-finance-guide/federal-spending/)

      You’d guess based on fiscal responsibility that Congress and the President would be focusing on the 93%, right? No, they’re going after minor parts of the 7% fitting into _other_. The last surplus we had was during Clinton when he and Congress significantly trimmed back National Defense, amongst other tough line items. 9/11 happened a few years later and juiced military spending for the next two decades until present. Doge and pony shows aren’t going to get us out of this.

      Journalists I listen to talk about this.

    13. Comfortable_City1892 on

      You can see below it went up nearly 50% during Covid and they never cut it back because government always increases the budget.

      2018
      ~$4.1 trillion
      Wikipedia
      2019
      ~$4.4 trillion
      Wikipedia
      2020
      ~$6.5 trillion
      Wikipedia
      2021
      ~$6.8 trillion
      Wikipedia
      2022
      ~$6.3 trillion
      Wikipedia
      2023
      ~$6.1 trillion
      Wikipedia
      2024
      ~$6.75 trillion
      Wikipedia
      2025 (estimate/ projection)
      ~$6.8 trillion+ (budgeted)

    14. Comfortable_City1892 on

      It will not change. We are 10 trillion more in debt than we should be. They never cut back to normal after COVID spending mania.

    15. Rafael Cruz gave the game away years ago. A reporter asked him why they only care about the debt when a Democrat is in charge and he just responded with a super smug look on his face and a shrug and basically said, “yup, we do that.”

    16. Journalists focusing on anything bad in our country?

      Never!

      All bought, controlled, and bullied by Trump.

    Leave A Reply
    Share via