In the 76 day period between Trump winning and Biden leaving office $93 BILLION was sent from the DOE, who gave it away with no oversight, to entities with no business plans or financials. That’s more than the previous 15 years combined
https://x.com/WallStreetApes/status/1925872101224808609
Posted by MazdaProphet
10 Comments
Sources
https://energynewsbeat.co/senator-kennedy-sheds-insights-to-the-93-billion-doe-waste-scandal/
https://www.independentsentinel.com/ex-sec-granholm-rushed-93b-in-loans-to-sketchy-greenies-in-76-days/
https://pjmedia.com/matt-margolis/2025/05/23/joe-bidens-93-billion-scandal-that-no-ones-talking-about-yet-n4940098
https://www.climatedepot.com/2025/05/28/joe-bidens-energy-dept-wasted-93-billion-in-bad-loans-76-days-before-trump-took-office/
Here is a video of congressional hearings
https://www.facebook.com/mtgfanclubpage/videos/-sen-john-kennedy-reveals-the-biden-doe-spent-93-billion-in-just-76-days-as-trum/829425673424656/
No one has been charged
This is the real crime that impacts millions of tax payers, not some stupid commentary we see on TV all the time…🤷🏼♀️
always fun to see morons in the wild throw their poop
This sub really needs to have better modding
It was the plan all along. If you follow the trail. It all ties back to Trump’s family.
Why do you guys think he wasn’t to stay in power so bad?
The whole proposition that the whole process was done in the 76 days doesn-t seem to have much of a basis. I think they should go for an investigation into each one to see if there is a record of application, approval, work done, etc..
Both person asking and answering the question are part of this administration, and so have a stake in making the previous one look bad. Why has this only come to public more than 1 year since it happened? Was the current administration so much off the ball that they didn-t detect this?
According to snopes it was closer to [$70-80B](https://www.snopes.com/news/2025/05/29/biden-department-of-energy-loans/), but the premise that there was a huge flurry of activity between the election and the inauguration seems accurate
This should be fully investigated. If true it’s criminal.
Conservative news like to announce fake news without a basis so free thinking people will look and discredit it. Then when actual news comes out, conservative leaders and news call it fake and try to discredit it and the conservative mind hive says “yeah they said that about us, must actually be true about them.”
I don’t understand why they can’t just report news with real figures that are backed up. Like why couldn’t they use actual numbers that are reported but are still big. And why not show actual numbers they compare to. “$63B in final quarter and previous largest was x in year 20xx” or something like that. It only makes sense to do if they WANT you to be distrustful of media or anything.
Troll farm post with troll farm raiding in the comments. Nice “sources.” This is some Rogan level shit. GTFO chud.