Actually it probably wraps up the litigation faster, however the Dep’t of Education still needs to begin a negotiated rulemaking that will likely result in a final rule that won’t take effect until July 1, 2027.
LouderKnights on
So what does this mean for us SAVE people in limbo? Anyone more versed in this please explain. Im trying to hold out hope of staying in forbearance until I can get a better paying job towards the end of this year, when hopefully I could actually afford to pay something.
Mr_Soul_Crusher on
So how can the judge dismiss the case saying there isn’t any standing, and then turn out be like “lol jk we are gonna screw ya some more!”
Skimster on
Can we get that interest pause put back in place? Please???
AfternoonOld7627 on
I read over on College Investor that this reversal essentially eliminates the need for Negotiated Rulemaking, and allows Ed to instantly do whatever they want with us on SAVE.
5 Comments
Actually it probably wraps up the litigation faster, however the Dep’t of Education still needs to begin a negotiated rulemaking that will likely result in a final rule that won’t take effect until July 1, 2027.
So what does this mean for us SAVE people in limbo? Anyone more versed in this please explain. Im trying to hold out hope of staying in forbearance until I can get a better paying job towards the end of this year, when hopefully I could actually afford to pay something.
So how can the judge dismiss the case saying there isn’t any standing, and then turn out be like “lol jk we are gonna screw ya some more!”
Can we get that interest pause put back in place? Please???
I read over on College Investor that this reversal essentially eliminates the need for Negotiated Rulemaking, and allows Ed to instantly do whatever they want with us on SAVE.
Can anyone comment on this?