Everyone keeps treating Palantir like a government contractor with a flashy demo. That read is at least two years stale.
Q4 bookings hit $4.3B. US commercial TCV came in at $1.3B. AIP — their AI platform — is not a prototype anymore. It is generating real enterprise deals at real scale. The boot camp model turned into a repeatable sales motion and the close rates on those deals are not what you get from vaporware.
The commercial growth rate in the US was 54% year-over-year last quarter. That is not a government-dependent company. Government is still growing and still sticky, but the commercial segment is what changes the valuation math here.
What the market keeps pricing is the old Palantir — the one burning cash on long-cycle government contracts with lumpy revenue and a cult CEO. The current version has positive free cash flow, a US commercial engine that keeps accelerating, and an AI platform that large enterprises are actually deploying in production.
The pushback is always valuation, and I get it. It is not cheap. But the question is whether the growth multiple is sustainable given the trajectory, and the AIP adoption numbers make a reasonable case that it is. When US commercial TCV nearly doubles from one year to the next, the standard DCF that slaps a 20x revenue multiple on it and calls it overvalued is probably missing the compounding.
I am not saying this is a layup. The multiple still needs to be earned. But the thesis that AIP is just hype is getting harder to maintain with every quarter.
$PLTR — The AIP numbers are real and the US commercial acceleration is being ignored
byu/Variant_Invest inoptions
Posted by Variant_Invest