everyone is talking about the iran war and trump’s tariffs, but i wanted to see which companies are actually panicking in their official sec filings. i spent my entire weekend digging through the "risk factors" section of the 2 most recent 10-Ks for 98 s&p 500 companies.

    i looked for 8 specific themes: tariffs, war, geopolitical, oil/energy, sanctions, supply chain, interest rates, and recession.

    here is the data. some of this makes zero sense on paper, but the 10-Ks don't lie.

    the "macro risk" top 10 (highest exposure)

    ticker company exposure score key risk mentions
    MS morgan stanley 95.6 221 total (massive geopolitical/war)
    C citigroup 91.2 269 total (highest volume in the scan)
    BAC bank of america 80.4 102 mentions
    GS goldman sachs 67.2 heavy institutional/trading risk
    JPM jpmorgan 62.1 systemic macro exposure
    CVX chevron 58.0 188 oil/energy mentions (obviously)
    BLK blackrock 52.1 asset management/global exposure
    EOG eog resources 50.2 142 oil mentions
    CDNS cadence 45.6 21 tariff mentions (semis getting hit)
    REGN regeneron 43.7 36 tariff mentions (surprising for pharma)

    the "safe haven" list (the ones who don't care)

    if you're looking for where to hide, these companies basically didn't even mention the war or tariffs in their risk factors:

    • PGR (progressive): only 7 mentions total.
    • UNH (unitedhealth): 6 mentions.
    • NFLX (netflix): 6 mentions.
    • COST (costco): 8 mentions.

    3 things that surprised me:

    1. banks are the real "war" stocks: i expected oil companies to be #1, but morgan stanley and citi are screaming about geopolitical risk way louder. they are terrified of credit defaults and trade finance collapsing while the market is at all-time highs.
    2. the semiconductor "sanction" trap: nvda (ranked #13) and cdns have massive exposure to sanctions and tariffs. nvda has 50 mentions of "sanctions" alone. the "ai moat" is built on a very fragile geopolitical foundation. if the strait stays closed, the supply chain for chips is toast.
    3. pharma is not immune: regeneron (regn) has 36 tariff mentions. i didn't realize how much their supply chain for raw materials is tied to the current trade war.

    the "so what?"

    the market is pricing in a "soft landing" or a "short war," but the banks are writing 200+ page warnings about systemic collapse. either the banks are being overly cautious for legal reasons, or they are seeing a credit crunch that the retail market is completely ignoring.

    i'm personally looking at costco and progressive as the only real "sleep at night" stocks right now.

    what am i missing? are the banks just covering their asses with legal boilerplate, or is the risk in the financial sector a legitimate warning for the entire s&p 500?

    not financial advice. i'm just a guy who spent too much time on sec edgar this weekend.

    i spent my weekend reading 98 s&p 500 10-Ks for tariff and war risks. the results are.. weird. banks are way more exposed than oil companies
    byu/Upset-Commercial-661 inwallstreetbets



    Posted by Upset-Commercial-661

    28 Comments

    1. MightyPenguinRoars on

      Thanks for doing this! This is the kind of unique research I like reading into. Whether or not it’s actionable is another thing, but very intriguing to
      watch!

    2. This may just be banks having way more sophistication with compliance and risk management.

    3. Did you just control F geopolitical in these 10-Ks? Or what goes into the “score”?

    4. Top_Category_2526 on

      I’m gonna spend my entire weekend playing red or black, touching myself and drinking cheap whisky, i will buy whatever on Monday before WWIII

    5. callsonreddit on

      You lose a lot of credibility from me when you say PGR UNH NFLX COST are safe haven stocks

    6. Perfect-Obligation60 on

      That section of the 10K is just to CYA for most companies. Risk section tends to contain risks even if those risks are remote just to mitigate litigation. You will find that these risks align by industry so kind of a waste of time to dig through individual 10Ks for this.

    7. Embarrassed-Ad7850 on

      Wow what research this guy searched for mentions of certain words. Didn’t even bother with trying to correlate things further. Outstanding

    8. I like how you made this all lower case to make it seem like an LLM didn’t write it.

    9. DocBigBrozer on

      I’d invest in Costco out of principle. Not to exposed internationally, solid local growth, 1.50usd hot dog and coke. Wendy’s is to expensive now

    10. ‘ i took the whole weekend reading’ aka i asked Claude hey write me some bs for reddit

    Leave A Reply
    Share via
    Share via