I know the New York Times article came out a few days ago regarding John Carreyrou’s analysis hypothesizing that Adam Back is Satoshi. I know not everybody has had the time to read the article. NYT’s The Daily episode today recaps John’s evidence, and has a new response directly from Adam. Adam continues to deny the accusation that he is Satoshi, however he also provides a clear rationale why he doesn’t personally think that Satoshi should be unmasked. This clearly benefits his own interests, if he was Satoshi. It’s also noteworthy that he doesn’t have any supporting alibi nor plausible explanation to discredit the NYT evidence, other than claiming the NYT research is just a coincidence. Worth a listen, especially if you haven’t already read the article. I’m curious what everybody’s thoughts are?
Posted by htr101