I’ve been thinking about a different approach to combining poker solvers, AI, and crypto-style incentives, and I’d love to get feedback from people who understand poker theory, game design, or tokenomics.
Core Idea
- “Miners” run GPU-based poker AI (solver / NN policies)
- These AIs become opponents in a tournament system
- Players buy tokens to enter tournaments and play against AI (not other players)
- Rewards are distributed based on ranking (leaderboard / tournament results), not direct PvP winnings
So this is PvE poker (player vs AI) with a competitive ranking system.
Key Differences from Traditional Poker
- No direct player vs player money flow
- Players are effectively competing against a pool of AI opponents
- Rewards come from a shared prize pool (entry fees)
Miner Role
Instead of mining hashes, miners:
- Provide AI opponents (solver / trained models)
- Get rewarded based on:
- How often their AI is used
- Or performance / quality of their AI
High-Level Economy
- Players:
- Buy tokens → enter tournaments
- Win rewards based on ranking
- Miners:
- Provide AI compute / models
- Earn tokens from player activity (not just inflation)
- System:
- Takes a cut (like rake)
- Potentially burns some tokens
Why This Might Work
- Avoids direct gambling / PvP issues
- Creates a skill-based PvE competitive system
- Turns solver/AI into a service layer, not just a tool
- Could feel like:
- “Poker roguelike”
- “AI boss ladder”
Concerns / Open Questions
- Player Experience
- If AI is too strong → players quit
- If AI is too weak → system gets exploited
- Exploitability
- Even strong AI can have leaks
- Good players might farm specific bots
- Skill Gap
- Top players could dominate rewards
- Needs matchmaking / brackets?
- Token Pressure
- Players buy token to play, then sell after
- Miners also sell → constant sell pressure
- Miner Incentives
- What stops miners from submitting low-quality or fake “AI”?
- How do you verify real compute vs reused strategies?
- Sustainability
- Is this actually fun long-term?
- Or does it become solved / repetitive?
What I’m Trying to Figure Out
- Is this fundamentally viable, or just another GameFi death spiral waiting to happen?
- What’s the biggest flaw in this model?
- Has anyone seen something similar actually work?
Would really appreciate thoughts, especially from:
- Solver / GTO people
- Game designers
- Crypto / tokenomics folks
Tear it apart 🙏
Idea: AI Poker Tournaments Powered by Distributed “Miners” — Does This Economic Model Make Sense?
byu/Shot-Print-2964 inCryptoTechnology
Posted by Shot-Print-2964