I’m 23 and been looking at UK house prices from the 70s–2000s and how much they’ve grown. It made me wonder if what property was for previous generations is now basically index funds/ETFs for ours.

    If you just consistently invest in a global ETF over decades, are you not getting roughly similar long-term % growth to property anyway?

    ETFs seem to have some obvious upsides
    Easy to sell and access cash quickly
    No repairs, tenants, maintenance, or surprise costs
    You can start with small amounts instead of needing a huge deposit

    Property still has its strengths
    Leverage via mortgages
    Rental income potential
    It’s a real asset everyone needs

    But it’s also expensive to get into, harder to sell, and comes with ongoing hassle.

    Genuinely curious where people land on this. Is this a fair comparison or am I missing something key?

    Is investing in ETFs today the “property play” our parents had?
    byu/Secure_Beginning_939 ininvesting



    Posted by Secure_Beginning_939

    Leave A Reply