​Hi r/CryptoMarkets,

    ​I've been researching GraphLinq Protocol (GLQ) due to its focus on Layer-1 infrastructure and no-code AI automation. However, I’ve hit a wall regarding its tokenomics and conflicting supply data across major aggregators.

    ​I'm hoping someone here who tracks L1 emissions or GLQ directly can help clarify these points:

    ​1. Total & Max Supply Mismatch

    ​Etherscan & CoinGecko: Report a total supply capped at 500,000,000 GLQ (legacy ERC-20).

    ​CoinMarketCap & Coinbase: Report a total supply of ~650,000,000 GLQ.

    ​KuCoin / Exchange Docs: Mention figures up to 1,000,000,000 GLQ.

    ​Question: What is the actual combined total and hard max supply across both the Ethereum contract and the native GraphLinq Chain?

    ​2. The Missed 32% Circulating Supply

    Aggregators place circulating supply at ~340,000,000 GLQ (~68%).

    ​Where are the remaining ~160M tokens held (Treasury, Staking Pools, Team)?

    ​Is there an active, transparent vesting schedule or public multi-sig address to track these allocations?

    ​3. Block Rewards vs. Burn Mechanics (Net Inflation)

    According to official docs, the native PoS chain issues 5 GLQ per block (~15s block time = ~10.5M GLQ issued annually). Meanwhile, execution fees burn GLQ.

    ​Is the native chain perpetually inflationary, or is there an emission cap?

    ​Is there a reliable dashboard or explorer to track real-time net emission rates (Minted vs. Burned)?

    ​4. Data Aggregator Sync

    Has the team acknowledged why API data between CoinGecko, CoinMarketCap, and major exchanges remains un-synchronized after the native chain launch?

    ​Appreciate any technical insights or links to official team responses on this.

    Thanks!

    ​[GLQ / GraphLinq] Need help verifying supply metrics, inflation, and data discrepancies across aggregators
    byu/Acrobatic-Eye-5591 inCryptoMarkets



    Posted by Acrobatic-Eye-5591

    Leave A Reply