The meltdown at a nuclear power station in Fukushima, Japan, ten years ago stoked anxieties about nuclear energy. But nuclear is one of the safest, most reliable and sustainable forms of energy, and decarbonising will be much more difficult without it.

    Further content:

    Sign up to our newsletter about climate change: https://econ.st/38bLSO9

    The Economist also has a new weekly newsletter, Simply Science: https://econ.st/3uWjw4b

    Find all our coverage on science and technology: https://econ.st/3c3aEB1

    See our latest coverage on climate change: https://econ.st/3uY1ZZd

    Why didn’t the Fukushima disaster spur reforms in Japan? https://econ.st/3e8BDxS

    The lessons about nuclear power, ten years on from Fukushima: https://econ.st/3c2fcYC

    What is the future of Britain’s nuclear reactors? https://econ.st/3bg8ejt

    Why smaller nuclear reactors might be better: https://econ.st/38dMQcz

    How the world relies on Russia for nuclear power plants: https://econ.st/3kMqy6V

    Listen to an episode of The Intelligence podcast about nuclear arms control: https://econ.st/3kO6i4N

    Will nuclear energy power war zones? https://econ.st/3qsdipr

    Could floating reactors be a better option? https://econ.st/3uTIvVM

    The most promising zero-carbon resources: https://econ.st/3kLlYG9

    Comments are closed.

    Share via