Am I getting screwed? Unfair evaluation on total loss vehicle

2012 Land Rover Range Rover Sport Supercharged
56,000 miles, clean title with no accidents

This vehicle in question was deemed a total loss by insurance company after a hail storm in Pennsylvania.

I was provided a CCC One report with an evaluation. Price given was $10,362 with a $1,147 condition adjustment for a total of $11,509 (excluding vehicular tax of $865). "Condition adjustment" is strictly for cosmetic/mechanical, NOT mileage.

COMP #1
2012 Range Rover Sport HSE – 127,000 miles
Price List $9,995 Adjusted comp $9,996

COMP #2
2012 Range Rover Sport HSE – 102,000 miles
Price List $9,995 Adjusted comp $11,086

COMP #3
2013 Range Rover Sport HSE – 155,000 miles
Price List $9,525 Adjusted comp $11,078

They are using comps with double to triple the mileage as mine and saying these are a fair comparison. They are not giving me a mileage price adjustment for my vehicle having 40,000 – 100,000 LESS miles than their comps. They used lower cost HSE models and not Supercharged variants.

I was told to submit a list of comps that I thought were comparable (of which I did, 14 to be exact with similar mileage) that were priced $14,500-$18,500. Zero of my comps were accepted and none were used.

I was told Pennsylvania has strict laws that limit the search distance to 100 miles from the owner's zip code and they are not allowed to provide mileage price adjustments from the comparables.

Would invoking a third party appraisal clause even do anything if there aren't any comps with similar mileage within a 100 mile radius? They are no comparable vehicles within a 100 mile radius with under 100k miles when I search on multiple different sites.