Anyone posts junk or hold forever it's fine but the moment some constructive analysis is posted it gets deleted. It's almost like the moderators have ulterior motive…
And don’t forget not to say no no words! There are children investing here, so no profanity.
PastaVeggies on
The goal is to scam more people so the price holds up. No room for constructive analysis.
Disastrous-Display82 on
Once you see what those Dogecoin clowns post on the X app (literally zero audience, zero likes, zero everything), you’ll instantly get why they’re stuck in 2013. Zero brain, zero style, zero relevance. It’s like watching a bunch of expired memes trying to cosplay as investors. Embarrassing 🙈
liquid_at on
In 99% of all cases where people claimed that their post was completely normal and got removed for no reason, the post wasn’t completely normal and was removed for a reason.
The 2 main reasons for posts being removed in this sub is when they clearly break rules or when a large amount of users reports them.
And given that the title of your removed post was “word of caution”, I doubt that your representation of “constructive analysis” was correct…
4 Comments
And don’t forget not to say no no words! There are children investing here, so no profanity.
The goal is to scam more people so the price holds up. No room for constructive analysis.
Once you see what those Dogecoin clowns post on the X app (literally zero audience, zero likes, zero everything), you’ll instantly get why they’re stuck in 2013. Zero brain, zero style, zero relevance. It’s like watching a bunch of expired memes trying to cosplay as investors. Embarrassing 🙈
In 99% of all cases where people claimed that their post was completely normal and got removed for no reason, the post wasn’t completely normal and was removed for a reason.
The 2 main reasons for posts being removed in this sub is when they clearly break rules or when a large amount of users reports them.
And given that the title of your removed post was “word of caution”, I doubt that your representation of “constructive analysis” was correct…