A few interesting debates have surfaced recently about the potential impact of quantum computing on crypto, including the one between Nic Carter and Adam Back. But here’s the real question: does it even matter who's right? The reality is, quantum computing is causing uncertainty, and it has the potential to disrupt crypto in ways we can’t predict.
We’re not quantum experts, but we know uncertainty when we see it. The risk is real, and no one can say for sure when quantum will pose a threat to cryptography. That’s why now is the time to hedge, not wait for things to unfold.
Instead of focusing on who’s right in the debate, the key takeaway is simple: the future is uncertain, and the best move is to plan for uncertainty with a hedge.
If there’s one thing to take away from the quantum crypto debate, it’s not who’s right or wrong, but now is the time to hedge
byu/Tsmacks1 inCryptoMarkets
Posted by Tsmacks1
3 Comments
Well, are there any publicly traded quantum computing company to hedge against? That would be an interesting question to ask.
QRL has been quantum resistant since 2018, and is by far the best hedge against the coming quantum threat.
no it’s really not
time has literally proven this – blockchains have been built for years and LITERALLY none of them have appreciated in value