Authoritarianism limits entrepreneurship. But there isn’t much innovation left to do regarding transition from a agricultural to industrialised country. Wouldn’t a technocratic one party state be better at speed running that process and development? USA adopted OSHA and improved labour rights when it was already pretty industrialised. So it seems human rights abuse is an unavoidable thing in this specific stage of a countries development. Wouldn’t a one party state be better equipped to handle that too?

    When a developing country is walking on an already known path isn’t one party system better?
    byu/Leading-Sandwich-534 inAskEconomics



    Posted by Leading-Sandwich-534

    Leave A Reply
    Share via