‘Absolutely no detail’: experts alarmed as Trump unveils healthcare plan

    https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jan/15/trump-healthcare-reform-framework

    Posted by burtzev

    20 Comments

    1. Some gems from Whitehouse.gov:

      “Your prescription drugs will come way, way down and, under this policy, the prices of many drugs will be slashed by 300, 400 even 500% starting this month at the Trumprx.gov.”

      “The government is going to pay the money directly to you. It goes to you, and then you take the money and buy your own healthcare… the big insurance companies lose and the people of our country win.”

      “I want to end this flagrant scam and put extra money straight into the healthcare savings account in your name, and you go out and buy your own healthcare, and you’ll make a great deal, you’ll get better healthcare for less money—that way you can choose the care that is right for your family.”

      Still only the vaguest explanation on how this is supposed to work, where the money is going to come from for these government sponsored HSAs (how is this any different than ACA subsidies?), let alone slashing the price of drugs by… 500%!

    2. I can’t wait til I finally get to complain about trumpcare nonstop for the next decade.😈

      >titled the Great Healthcare Plan

      Ugh, I just can’t even anymore. Named like a kindergartener would.

    3. Here’s the key difference MAGA keep missing:

      **The Affordable Care Act is a functioning system.
      This White House document is a list of slogans.**

      They are not even operating at the same level.

      ## How the ACA actually works

      The ACA is not one idea. It is a **multi-layered regulatory and financing framework** designed to stabilize insurance markets while expanding coverage.

      It does several hard things at once:

      ### 1. It creates a regulated insurance market
      – Guaranteed issue: insurers must cover people regardless of pre-existing conditions
      – Community rating: limits how much insurers can vary premiums by age
      – Essential Health Benefits: minimum coverage standards so plans cannot quietly become junk

      This is the foundation. Without it, the rest collapses.

      ### 2. It stabilizes risk pools
      The ACA explicitly addresses adverse selection.

      It does this through:
      – Subsidies tied to income
      – Cost-sharing reductions
      – Market rules that discourage cherry-picking healthy people
      – Risk adjustment among insurers

      This is boring, technical, and absolutely necessary. Insurance markets fail without it.

      ### 3. It uses subsidies, not vouchers
      ACA subsidies are:
      – Income-based
      – Tied to benchmark plans
      – Automatically adjusted
      – Designed to scale with medical inflation

      This matters because healthcare costs are not static. Vouchers are.

      ### 4. It integrates with existing systems
      The ACA does not pretend Medicare, Medicaid, and employer insurance do not exist.

      Instead it:
      – Expands Medicaid where states allow
      – Preserves employer-sponsored insurance
      – Coordinates eligibility across programs
      – Uses federal enforcement through HHS and CMS

      This is why it actually functions nationally.

      ### 5. It is enforceable law
      The ACA is:
      – Thousands of pages of statute and regulation
      – Backed by budgets
      – Enforced by agencies
      – Litigated, stress-tested, and amended over 15 years

      It survives because it is built to survive.

      ## What the White House document does instead

      Now compare that to what this document offers.

      ### 1. No market structure
      There is:
      – No guaranteed issue framework
      – No explanation of pre-existing conditions
      – No definition of minimum coverage
      – No mechanism to prevent insurers from dumping sick patients

      You cannot say “choice” and skip market rules. That is how pre-ACA markets failed.

      ### 2. Vouchers without guardrails
      “Send the money directly to the people” is a voucher system.

      What is missing:
      – How voucher amounts are calculated
      – Whether they adjust for age or illness
      – How they keep premiums from rising faster than vouchers
      – How risk pools remain viable

      This is the exact problem the ACA was designed to solve.

      ### 3. No risk management at all
      The document does not mention:
      – Adverse selection
      – Risk adjustment
      – Reinsurance
      – Enrollment stability

      This omission alone disqualifies it as a serious proposal.

      ### 4. Transparency without enforcement
      The ACA already tried transparency.
      It paired it with:
      – Medical loss ratio rules
      – Rate review
      – Federal enforcement authority

      This document:
      – Demands disclosures
      – Provides no enforcement
      – Ignores how insurers game transparency rules

      Posting numbers does not change incentives.

      ### 5. Drug pricing without legal reality
      The ACA uses:
      – Statutory authority
      – CMS rulemaking
      – Negotiation within defined programs

      This document:
      – Repeats MFN talking points
      – Ignores prior court failures
      – Explains nothing about implementation scope

      Wishing prices lower is not policy.

      ## The core difference

      The ACA answers hard questions:
      – Who pays?
      – Who enforces?
      – Who is protected?
      – What happens when things go wrong?

      This document avoids those questions entirely.

      ## Bottom line

      The ACA is flawed, complex, and imperfect.

      But it is:
      – Structured
      – Enforceable
      – Integrated
      – Designed to survive reality

      This White House document is:
      – Aspirational
      – Vague
      – Non-operational
      – Structurally incomplete

      They are not alternatives.

      One is governance.
      The other is messaging.

    4. Bigcouchpotato1 on

      I don’t know why they don’t just change the name of the ACA to TrumpCare, declare victory and go home.

    5. DolphinsBreath on

      >…titled the Great Healthcare Plan

      Ah, that’s the problem, they didn’t let him add TRUMP anywhere in the name.

    6. _FIRECRACKER_JINX on

      Wow… At a time where an AI can write a decent healthcare plan for anyone willing to put in the promoting time …

    7. Sounds like A LOT of regulations.

      Doesnt he need to delete 10 regulations for every new one? Seems like lead is back on the menu and fingers and toes in our ground turkey and pork (who can afford beef amirite?)

    Leave A Reply
    Share via