bbc.com: "A source told the BBC the tone of the discussion between Hegseth and Amodei was cordial, but Amodei laid out what Anthropic considers to be its red lines.
These include involvement in autonomous kinetic operations in which AI tools make final military targeting decisions without human intervention.
The use of Anthropic tools for mass domestic surveillance constitutes another red line, the source said."
My Opinion: AI should not be autonomously allowed to target or strike humans. But what about machines fighting with machines? AI surveillance of the domestic population is not acceptable. But military surveillance of your enemies, during war is acceptable.
Why should the military have unrestricted access to AI models without any gaurdrails? If so, then so should civilians. And why can't the military train its own AI models, which it can use for whatever purpose it sees fit. I think private AI companies should continue to engage with the military, as their influence will reduce the worst excesses of the military.
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cjrq1vwe73po
Posted by truthandfreedom3
1 Comment
Why does the military have access to things the general population don’t? I dunno. I too would love to have my own nuke sitting in my garage collecting dust.