This sort of blew up on r/ValueInvesting so posting here too.

    I work in AI and started trading casually last year. Like any good regard, I immediately subscribed to every investing newsletter I could find on Substack. 23 paid subscriptions. $9,600/year, including Michael Burry's.

    The problem? I can't actually read them all. And I have no idea which ones are worth the money.

    So I did what any engineer would do — I wrote codes to find out.

    What I Built

    A pipeline that:
    – Crawls every article from 23 paid Substack authors (1,782 articles over the past year)
    – Uses Gemini AI to extract high-conviction stock picks only — not casual mentions, but tickers the author actually analyzed in depth
    – Tracks returns at 1d, 7d, 15d, 30d, and 60d after publication
    – Calculates alpha vs sector benchmarks (SOXX for semis, IGV for SaaS, XLF for financial services etc)
    – Dedupes: if the same author calls the same ticker multiple times within 14 days, it only counts once (first mention wins). Different authors calling the same ticker are tracked independently

    Total dataset: 3,519 high-conviction calls tracked over 1 year.

    The Results

    30-Day Absolute Return Leaderboard (Long Calls)

    Rank Author Calls 30d Avg Return
    1 Global Tech Research 50 +14.9%
    2 Paulo Macro 21 +9.5%
    3 Collyer Bridge 89 +8.7%
    4 Doomberg 79 +7.8%
    5 SemiAnalysis 80 +7.5%
    6 Altay Capital 15 +7.2%
    7 The Overshoot 24 +7.1%
    8 The Setup Factory 285 +6.7%
    9 Fabricated Knowledge 50 +5.8%
    10 Macro Charts 72 +3.6%

    30-Day Alpha vs Benchmark (Long Calls)

    Rank Author Calls 30d Avg Alpha
    1 Global Tech Research 50 +9.4%
    2 Paulo Macro 21 +6.8%
    3 Altay Capital 15 +5.2%
    4 Collyer Bridge 89 +4.8%
    5 The Setup Factory 285 +4.3%
    6 Doomberg 79 +3.8%
    7 SemiAnalysis 80 +3.4%
    8 Lord Fed 86 +3.1%
    9 The Overshoot 24 +1.8%
    10 Shrubstack 100 +1.5%

    30-Day Win Rate (Long Calls)

    Rank Author Calls Win Rate
    1 Paulo Macro 21 85%
    2 Altay Capital 15 85%
    3 Global Tech Research 50 81%
    4 The Overshoot 24 79%
    5 Doomberg 79 72%

    But 30 Days Isn't the Whole Story

    30d is a reasonable window for swing traders, but some of these authors are deep value investors with 6-12 month theses. Here's what the 60-day numbers look like — the rankings shift significantly:

    60-Day Absolute Return Top 10 (Long Calls)

    Rank Author Calls 60d Avg Return
    1 Global Tech Research 50 +26.7%
    2 SemiAnalysis 80 +16.7%
    3 Fabricated Knowledge 50 +14.2%
    4 Altay Capital 15 +13.7%
    5 Doomberg 79 +12.6%
    6 Paulo Macro 21 +12.1%
    7 Macro Charts 72 +11.1%
    8 The Setup Factory 285 +10.8%
    9 The Overshoot 24 +9.6%
    10 TicToc Trading 180 +8.9%

    Notable shifts: Fabricated Knowledge jumps from #9 (30d: +5.8%) to #3 (60d: +14.2%). Altay Capital goes from +7.2% to +13.7%. Deep value theses need time to play out. Conversely, Collyer Bridge drops out of the top 10 at 60d — their edge is more short-term.

    Take these numbers for what they are: one time horizon among many. A 60d or even 90d window would tell a different story for buy-and-hold investors. This is for information, not gospel.

    And at the bottom…

    Michael J Burry: 24 long calls, 30d avg return +0.1%, 60d avg return -11.1%, 30d alpha -2.7% (60d alpha: -11.4%). Then again, The Big Short took 2 years to play out — maybe his thesis just needs more time than our 60-day window can capture.

    Methodology Caveats (Please Challenge This)

    I want to be upfront about limitations:

    1. AI extraction isn't perfect. Gemini parses articles and extracts ticker calls. To reduce noise, we only count high conviction — where the author dedicates multiple paragraphs, specific data, or explicit price targets. Passing mentions are filtered out.
    2. We validated this. Spot-checked extraction accuracy against manual reads, and cross-verified with alternative model outputs (codex / claude). It's not 100%, but it's consistent.
    3. Survivorship bias matters. We only track tickers with available price data. Delisted stocks, non-US tickers without yfinance data, and typos get counted as No Data and excluded from return calculations.
    4. This is a bull market. Many of these authors are long-biased. Absolute returns look good partly because the market went up. The alpha column adjusts for this using sector-specific ETF benchmarks.
    5. The full dataset is available. All 3,519 calls, every author, every ticker, every return at every horizon. You can audit everything. I will put up the link later.

    What I Learned

    • The expensive ones aren't always the best. Some of the top performers cost 80−360/year.Some1,000+ newsletters are mid-table.
    • Volume ≠ quality. Authors with 300+ calls often have mediocre win rates. The ones with 15-80 highly targeted calls tend to outperform.
    • Shorts are hard. Almost every author has worse short performance than long. The few exceptions (Global Tech Research shorts: -20.5% at 60d) are impressive outliers.
    • Michael Burry's Substack picks haven't worked yet — but his most famous trade took 2 years, so the jury's still out.

    Total Cost Breakdown

    $9,599/year across 23 newsletters. Here's every single one:

    Author Annual Fee Author Annual Fee
    James Bulltard $1,099 Paulo Macro $360
    Lord Fed ~$1,000 Collyer Bridge $350
    10x Research $948 The Overshoot $330
    Eliant Capital $760 Doomberg $300
    TMT Breakout $589 TicToc Trading $290
    SemiAnalysis $500 Global Tech Research $100
    Shrubstack $500 Earnings Edge $100
    The Setup Factory $450 Altay Capital $80
    Best Anchor Stocks $449 Quality Stocks $70
    Michael J Burry $439 Winter Gems $50
    Fabricated Knowledge $400 Swiss Transparent Portfolio ~$40
    Macro Charts $400 Total ~$9,599

    If I could only keep 5 based on this data: Global Tech Research (100),PauloMacro(360), Doomberg (300),SemiAnalysis(500), The Setup Factory (450).That′s1,710/year — 82% cheaper and probably better returns.

    Shoutout to every author on this list. Even the bottom-ranked ones taught me more about markets than any YouTube video. This isn't meant to trash anyone — just data.

    Happy to answer questions. Roast my methodology. Tell me I'm wrong. That's how this gets better.

    Full methodology + data / charts: https://x.com/pyhrroll/status/2027374283669066045?s=20

    Positions: long several names mentioned by top authors. Not financial advice, obviously.

    I spent $9,600/year on Substack newsletters so you don't have to. Here's who actually makes money.
    byu/PrimaryConcern2608 inwallstreetbets



    Posted by PrimaryConcern2608

    6 Comments

    1. This is some solid research. Looks like going with Global Tech Research would net you some solid gains.

    Leave A Reply
    Share via