One of the things I've been thinking about recently is how many blockchain applications still rely on trusted APIs.

    Examples:

    • compliance / sanctions checks
    • credit scoring
    • KYC verification
    • analytics or risk scoring

    In most systems today the workflow looks like this:

    Application → call API → trust the response

    Which means the application must trust that the provider:

    • ran the correct computation
    • used the correct dataset
    • didn't manipulate the result

    I've been experimenting with a different approach using zero-knowledge proofs.

    Instead of trusting the API provider, the provider returns:

    API response + ZK proof

    The application then verifies the proof before accepting the result.

    So the flow becomes:

    Off-chain computation
    → generate ZK proof
    → verify proof
    → consume result

    I built a small prototype called ZKCG (ZK Verified Computation Gateway) to explore this idea.

    The goal is to create a verification layer for off-chain computation so applications don't need to trust the provider — they only need to verify the proof.

    The prototype currently supports:

    • Halo2 proof verification
    • zkVM receipts (RISC0)

    And I implemented a compliance API example where a service computes a compliance check off-chain and returns a verifiable result.

    Repo:
    https://github.com/MRSKYWAY/ZKCG

    I'm curious what people building ZK systems think about this idea.

    Does the concept of "verifiable APIs" make sense as a primitive?

    What kinds of off-chain computations would actually benefit from this model?

    Would love feedback from anyone working with ZK systems.

    Replacing Trusted Compliance APIs with Zero-Knowledge Verified APIs
    byu/PitifulGuarantee3880 inCryptoTechnology



    Posted by PitifulGuarantee3880

    Leave A Reply
    Share via