Found an interesting comparison in a recent SolverRouter analysis. They benchmarked intent-based vs traditional DEX aggregation across the same routes.

    Key finding: "SODAX's intent-based swaps clocked 20-30 second executions across chains, undercutting rivals by over 1% on fees."

    The advantage comes from solver competition — instead of fixed routing, multiple solvers bid to fulfill your trade. Winner takes execution, loser gets nothing. Creates strong incentive alignment.

    Traditional aggregators like 1inch still dominate volume, but the gap is closing. Anyone tracking how much market share intent systems have taken in 2026?

    Intent-based DEX aggregators are outperforming traditional swaps — here's the data
    byu/hazy2go inCryptoTechnology



    Posted by hazy2go

    Leave A Reply
    Share via