I can understand where the idea comes from.

    A lot of people have not enough money to pay for college or their mortgage or all the expenses that they need to pay for utilities and housing and, while the average wages have increased since the past few decades, most of them are not enough to pay for the biggest investments of their lives

    I think that there is a reason why people are being more inclined or becoming exploited by people who continuously try to teach them about finances, but mostly ones that are related to the stock market or cryptocurrency or gambling.

    But can this lead to more competitors if the courses that they get are actually sound and real and this will lead to a lot of competition that can lead to a lot of conflict?

    Another that comes to mind are these influences that are becoming more famous or infamous based on their actions that are profitable for them but tend to use it make more money (even though the main exploitation) like Mr. Beast with this challenges and his solidarity actions and promotions of his own products, or Andrew Tate who uses his influence that are meant to sell this sense of 'ideal' of the masculine figure and mindset.

    In a weird way, people tend to hate them so what they do but the same time, if a person manages to get as much money as they do, there is a chance that they will use it for themselves or invest in something that is worthwhile or possibly into something that makes them more money.

    And there is a chance that the capitalistic system, through influence and lobbying or payments to powerful people, are more likely to be more suited to them, unless they have to fight against other wealthy people are fighting for influence and lobbying and want the situation to be geared to their favour

    So, isn't it weird that people often hate or blame those who have more money and say that the capitalistic system is unfair because it favours their lifestyle, but at the same time, people always want more money for themselves which can likely lead to them using that money for their own investments?

    I am not sure if this can be explained through science but I noticed something. People often want to have more money but they tend to blame about the ill of society to those who have more money. If the money is the motivation, then is this the trade-off?
    byu/sammyjamez inAskEconomics



    Posted by sammyjamez

    Leave A Reply
    Share via