https://reddit.com/link/1svnhj9/video/2erzt142fexg1/player
Hey r/btc! 👋
We all know the history of censorship and the block size wars that led to the creation of Bitcoin Cash. Now, history seems to be repeating itself in a very interesting way.
A new faction led by Peter Stork is pushing for a new BTC fork (featuring 400kb L1 blocks and drivechains) due to the heavy censorship and anti-inscription sentiment currently plaguing the BTC network. The twist? Instead of fighting for the "Bitcoin" name, they are calling it "eCash" and trying to take over the brand from the existing eCash (XEC) project.
I just published a deep dive on XolosArmy Network analyzing why the narrative is shifting from "What is the real Bitcoin?" to "What is the real eCash?", and what this means for the legacy of Satoshi's original vision.
You can read the full breakdown (and watch the video analysis featuring the Xolos 🐕) right here: 🔗https://xolosarmy.xyz/blog/ecash-is-the-new-bitcoin.html
Would love to hear the thoughts of this community. Are we witnessing the Roger Ver / bitcoin.com domain wars all over again?
The Block Size Wars are repeating… inside BTC. Why the "eCash" brand is the new battleground ⚔️
byu/XolosRamirez inbtc
Posted by XolosRamirez
1 Comment
You would think that if they cared about satoshi’s original vision then they wouldn’t assign all his coins to themselves at ecash launch