In the last few weeks I closed 2 MVP projects ($8.8k and $14k)

    And honestly, both had the same pattern:

    At the start, the founders wanted way more than they actually needed.

    Too many features
    Too much complexity
    Too much time before launch

    Once we cut everything down to the core idea, things became clear:

    • build faster
    • cheaper
    • test with real users sooner

    One project went from “full platform” → just a focused booking system
    The other from “complex mobile app” → core scanning + basic flow

    Most people don’t have a building problem
    They have a scoping problem

    And that’s where time and money gets lost

    Curious if anyone here is stuck before building or trying to figure out what their first version should actually include

    Most founders don’t need a full app. They need a smaller first version.
    byu/Naive-Wallaby9534 inEntrepreneur



    Posted by Naive-Wallaby9534

    3 Comments

    1. Few_Bluebird_2217 on

      Scoping is genuinely underrated! Most founders think they need a big product, when really they need an MVP to iterate quickly..

    2. yeah this is so true most people think they need more features, but usually they just need the smallest version that proves people actually want it scoping is honestly where a lot of projects die before they even launch

    3. This is spot on.
      Most teams don’t struggle with building – they struggle with saying no to features.

      The smaller the first version, the faster you actually learn what matters.

    Leave A Reply
    Share via
    Share via