Revenue $10.25B vs Est. $9.85B (up 38% YoY)
     EPS $1.37 vs. Est. $1.29 (up 48% YoY)
     Data Center Revenue $5.8B vs Est. $5.6B (up 57% YoY)
     Gross Margin 55% vs. Est. 52%

    Q2 Guidance
     Revenue $11.2B vs Est. $10.5B
     Gross Margin 56% vs. Est. 55%

    “We delivered an outstanding first quarter, driven by accelerating demand for AI infrastructure, with Data Center now the primary driver of our revenue and earnings growth,” said Dr. Lisa Su, AMD chair and CEO. 

    AMD’s stock soars as data center revenue jumps 57%
    byu/Red-RebelZz instocks



    Posted by Red-RebelZz

    19 Comments

    1. Peak fomo at this point. I keep buying VTI, but I am so jealous seeing these massive gains literally everywhere. Especially knowing that I sold all of my positions before the massive run ups

    2. Solidplum101 on

      This is the most insane run in a month with all the other “ai” hardware plays… during a war too.

      This will end very badly

    3. Business-Ad-5344 on

      100% serious: we’re about to enter the 1st inning. Maybe 2027 will be first inning of the AI boom.

    4. plumpypenguin on

      how long until AMD announces acquisition of NVDA in a half stock, half cash deal

    5. These stocks are at extreme pricing now…

      Not one pull back as the sector as a whole is up nearly 50% isnt a healthy market. Dont be surprised by a solid 25% correction very soon.

    6. This semi rally is insane but so are these numbers. Seems just off. Not saying books ae cooked but they just seem off or perhaps all the future buying front loaded perhaps due to assumed increase in upcoming costs.

    7. lolkkthxbye on

      Feels like the market has shifted in the past 12 months; seems the big/smart money has voted and decided that this AI thing is real, and good enough to replace expensive knowledge worker labor.

    8. Porcupinesolos on

      So jealous. I just have $Meta which is just making $AMD, $MU, $INTC holders rich instead of me

    9. I have 99% index funds. My one stock pick (2 whole shares) was AMD. Don’t make me look smart, market! Let me do the smart thing and buy index funds!

    10. TheSelfishMan on

      Maybe I’m dumb but isn’t there going to be a point at which demand stops increasing? Tech companies will probably continue to guide higher in the next few quarters but what happens when they cannot guide higher?

    11. Always makes me smile seeing someone getting mad that others are making shitload of money lol

    12. -----Marcel----- on

      This is more ridiculous than the Dot-com bubble. Intel, AMD and all of these stocks are beyond the Dot-com bubble. They are in their own bracket.

      “AMD adds $120 billion in market cap after beating revenue guidance by $700 million”

      Just look at the similarities. Here is my response to someone else👇🏻

      Using a historical 276x “average” dot-com P/E to prove today’s market isn’t in a bubble is complete nonsense. That 276x average is an unweighted stat completely warped by a single massive outlier – Yahoo!, which was trading at over 1,000x its trailing earnings at the peak. Yahoo is the sole reason that average is so high, and using it as a benchmark completely misses how equity bubbles actually form.

      The market as a whole doesn’t have to be in a macro-bubble for individual, systemic micro-bubbles to exist. Look at what is happening right now with individual stocks like AMD and Intel.

      The fact that AMD just added $120 billion in market cap after beating revenue guidance by a mere $700 million is the exact psychological decoupling from reality that happened during the dot-com peak. The market just priced that incremental chunk of fresh quarterly revenue at an astronomical 171x multiple.

      When you strip out the Yahoo anomaly and look at the actual forward and normal P/E ratios of the foundational tech giants in 2000—the “blue chips” people thought were safe. AMD is trading in the exact same orbit today:

      • AMD Today: Trades at an absurd trailing P/E of ~136x and a forward P/E of ~51x.

      • The 2000 Peak Reality: Microsoft sat at ~70x–75x, Intel was at ~45x, Oracle was at ~110x, and Cisco was at ~135x.

      AMD has officially reached the valuation heights that proved utterly unsustainable for Cisco and Microsoft for over a decade after the crash. Calling this anything other than overvalued and an individual bubble is fucking ridiculous.

      We are seeing severe sector concentration distorting everything. Look at Intel, Micron, SanDisk, and AMD over the past month and how the semiconductor index has practically engineered the market’s gains by itself. Semiconductors have ballooned to an unprecedented 14% of the S&P 500’s total market weight, shifting from a cyclical hardware play into a hyper-inflated infrastructure layer.

      The data proves how extreme this narrow sector distortion is: while the broader S&P 500 returned a standard ~10% for the quarter, the semiconductor sector skyrocketed by over 51% over the exact same period. Wall Street analysts estimate that this single group alone is driving roughly 40% of the S&P 500’s total year-over-year earnings growth, creating a massive index illusion where passive fund flows are hyper-inflating hardware makers.

      If you want a final reality check on what happens when a hardware “backbone” stock trades at these exact multiples, look at [Cisco Systems]. In March 2000, Cisco was hailed as the indispensable king of the internet infrastructure boom, trading at a 135x trailing P/E. When the music stopped, Cisco suffered a catastrophic 89.2% peak-to-trough drawdown. It took Cisco nearly 26 years just to claw its way back to its split-adjusted March 2000 intraday high.

      The broader market looks stable on the surface, but underneath, a handful of semiconductor stocks are carrying the entire weight of the financial system on multi-hundred-billion-dollar multiple expansions that defy basic math. History shows that when these individual infrastructure bubbles pop, the correction is brutal, and “great fundamentals” won’t save a stock trading at 130 times earnings.

    13. BeefyMcPissflaps on

      Finally changed the AMD narrative. Bought 2k shares back at 90ish in early 2025. Even leading up to earnings there was negative news cycles saying it would give up gains and not be good enough. It’s not easy to move a 5T company (NVDA) but it’s pretty easy for a 500bn company to double or triple if the financials support it. This is going to double again in the next year. Unless Trump decides to have another cognitive test at 3am and invade France because French Fries are American and they take credit. You never know.

    Leave A Reply