UNDER THE SURFACE THIS JOBS REPORT IS COMPLETELY ABSURD THE ECONOMY IS IN SHAMBLES

    THERE IS LARGE NEGATIVE JOB CREATION AMONG GOODS PRODUCING JOBS

    IF YOU TAKE OUT THE YOY GAINS FROM:

    -INDIVIDUAL AND FAMILY SERVICES (AKA RETIREMENT HOME EMPLOYEES) (+250K)

    -HOME HEALTH SERVICES (+100K)

    -OFFICES OF PHYSICIANS (+50K)

    – OFFICES OF OTHER HEALTH PRACITITONERS (+40K)

    -LOCAL GOVERNMENT (+70K)

    THE USA HAS LOST ALMOST 100K JOBS IN THE PAST YEAR

    DO NOT BE FOOLED THIS ECONOMY IS IN SHAMBLES

    Table B-1. Employees on nonfarm payrolls by industry sector and selected industry detail – 2026 M04 Results

    BLS Report Is a Complete Disaster, -100K Jobs YoY Without four retirement-centric sectors & local government
    byu/Primary-Abies9041 inwallstreetbets



    Posted by Primary-Abies9041

    49 Comments

    1. HoneyBadger552 on

      thanks for the deep dive. i knew something funky was going on. work in tech and we are not hiring. layoffs

    2. AntiqueProfessor5134 on

      The US is rapidly becoming a nursing home with a data center attached to it

    3. Realityhrts on

      This is like saying if you ignore the categories experiencing high inflation there is no inflation.

    4. Wait, so retirement home employees and health services are not good producing jobs? You have a huge aging (boomers and Gen X) population loaded with cash, needing help, but this is your ber DD? GTFO.

    5. No-Ambition2043 on

      lol. So jobs are lost when you subtract hundreds of thousands of jobs?

    6. Neither-Deal7481 on

      THE STOCK MARKET IS HALF A CASINO, HALF A RETIREMENT VEHICLE FOR OLDER FOLKS WHO VOTE FOR ME. I DON’T UNDERSTAND THE QUESTION. WE’LL SEE WHAT HAPPENS. IT’S ALL IN THE WEBSITE.

    7. Kerostasis on

      “Goods production” and “employment” are both relevant statistics, but they are *different* statistics and only loosely correlated. You seem to be assuming that if employment *within* a certain sector declines, the productivity of that same sector will also decline, but there’s no particular reason that must be true.

      (It may also *coincidentally* be true, but this report doesn’t show that.)

    8. OldAsk7462 on

      If you regress all his stats to the mean then Patrick Mahomes isn’t even good!

    9. Optimal_Brain_2908 on

      Home Care jobs are the fastest growing in the country until the service robots can begin folding laundry, driving grandma to her doctors appointment and taking out the garbage

    10. Particular_Yard_2460 on

      Every US tech based company I’ve worked for has a fancy office in California or Texas, workforce out of Asia and manufacturing in China.

      Why is anyone surprised they are losing jobs YoY

    11. OrdinaryReasonable63 on

      My nursing home stocks have been booming since last year (NHC, WELL). The great wealth transfer will not come by inheritance, it’s gonna come by nursing homes shaking these boomer vampires upside down.

    12. SunriseSurprise on

      >IF YOU TAKE OUT THE YOY GAINS FROM:

      >-INDIVIDUAL AND FAMILY SERVICES (AKA RETIREMENT HOME EMPLOYEES) (+250K)

      >-HOME HEALTH SERVICES (+100K)

      >-OFFICES OF PHYSICIANS (+50K)

      >- OFFICES OF OTHER HEALTH PRACITITONERS (+40K)

      >-LOCAL GOVERNMENT (+70K)

      >THE USA HAS LOST ALMOST 100K JOBS IN THE PAST YEAR

      Is this Mahomes “regress to the mean” talk or what? If you take out the good parts of the report it’s bad? lol

    13. Connect_Sugar_6572 on

      man this is wild, everyone talking about job growth but if you strip out the healthcare stuff for boomers we basically going backwards

    14. kashkash21 on

      one reason I heard healthcare sector is hiring so much:

      BLS counts doctors & nurses that work a 2nd hospital as a new job creation. when in reality its the same individual with the same job, different location

    15. Dirks_Knee on

      Umm…I guess I get the point you’re trying to make but shifts in job sector growth is still growth. Given the slowing birth rate and aging boomers, I think a short-ish term growth in most those sectors would be expected.

    16. Sorry, can’t take you seriously with full caps. You might be the next Warren Buffet but no, goodbye.

    17. Beaoorrrrr on

      Unemployment is crazy…at least all around me it is. My husband, a DOE, got laid off along with many others at his company (they couldn’t afford to pay them; his job got absorbed by his boss). My neighbor, accountant for 25 years, same thing. There’s a few people at my church who have also been laid off. WHAT is going ON? 😞 Hubby only just finding work after 3 months. This is crazy.

    18. Training-Solid-4650 on

      The jobs reports are filled with lies anyway, because if they the truth the people who write them get fired.

    19. Discount_LionSafari on

      *”Believe it or not, calls”* they said, as they took their last unemployed breath from the hentai virus.

    20. So if you take out the areas that are growing, the job market is not actually growing? Big if true

    21. Crazy_Donkies on

      “If you take out the areas we gained jobs, we lost jobs overall.”

      No shit.  That’s how everything works. Take out the positive and leave only negative, you get only negatives.

      I’ll give you the data may be cooked, and that we aren’t adding jobs, but that’s this administration’s goal.  Low paying jobs.

    22. equivalentMartingale on

      If you take out the jobs that were gained there were no jobs gained!

    23. DM_ME_4_FREE_STOCKS on

      But you see, everything is priced in. The stock market prices have famously never been wrong in the history of the world. Nothing to worry about.

    24. SquirrelFluffy on

      If you take out all The job gains the US has lost jobs? Is that how I am reading this post?

    25. If you’re going to agenda post at least make it good. This is sub 80 iq stuff

    26. tresslessaccount on

      I am so sorry the jobs numbers were good, this must be very hard for you.

    Leave A Reply