Most chains are great at value transfer, but real-world commerce usually needs more than transfer: escrow, milestone release, deposits, refunds, delivery windows, buyer approval, and dispute handling.

    A simple payment is objective. A marketplace transaction is usually conditional.

    Typical approaches seem to be:

    1. centralized escrow provider
    2. multisig with coordination overhead
    3. app-level smart contracts
    4. off-chain terms plus on-chain settlement

    But for actual commerce, escrow is not a niche feature — it is the trust layer.

    Curious how people here think about the design tradeoff: should escrow/agreement flows live closer to the protocol/application standard layer, or is this always better handled at the app layer?

    Why don’t more blockchains treat escrow/agreement flows as first-class primitives?
    byu/XRPresso_io inCryptoTechnology



    Posted by XRPresso_io

    Leave A Reply