12 Comments

    1. PourLarryaCrown on

      Taking inflation into account, what do you think that same house would sell for in another 57 years?

    2. Own-Chemist2228 on

      It gets better.

      They were paying property taxes on a fraction of the market value for decades.

      And if they buy another home – even a more expensive home – anywhere in California, their property taxes are still discounted because the assessed value transfers with the home (with some caveats)

    3. Except boomers are 62yrs old+ , would you want a large profit and almost be dead or stay in your 20’s and 30’s and figure it out

    4. That’s a 7% interest rate over 57 years.

      Your issue isn’t boomers your issue is you didn’t make a good investment 57 years ago.

    5. Retired_958_dude on

      That’s a little over 7% return of initial investment over 57 years. Do you really call that a good investment? Is that also considering all the improvements in house over those years? It’s okay, but not great.

      Granted, that house was more affordable to the average person in 1969 compared to now. That’s the real problem.

    6. faceisamapoftheworld on

      $27,000 invested in the S&P in 1969 would be worth 8.25 million today. That house was a terrible investment for that guy.

    7. Accurate-Bullfrog324 on

      Dad’s house. Pacific Palisades. $40k in 1960. $2M in 2022.

      this is not luck or chance. this is smart investing. nothing overnight or windfall. long-term strategy

    Leave A Reply