I posted on the 15th about Google showing a red 4 year 363 day chart and calling it "5 years" while the date on the Robinhood chart was actually 5 years ago.
A lot of people tried to gaslight me saying years aren't an exact unit of measurement, etc.
I assume these people were just GOOGL shills or something, and now it's April 17 and Google has an actual red 5 year chart while Robinhood has a green 5 year chart that seems based on the wrong price 5 years ago. So maybe now these people can handle admitting that 2 days ago, on April 15, Google saying April 17 was 5 years ago was off by 2 days.
Now that Google is the one with a seemingly accurate chart, is this subreddit ready to admit April 15 wasn't April 17?
byu/HowIsDigit8888 indogecoin
Posted by HowIsDigit8888
2 Comments
The main difference is that you assume that free data that corporatiosn post to be able to generate ad revenue is somehow reliable. We don’t.
We are aware that the data is not always correct. It is the expected default.
You seem to have figured that out by now and your emotions make you feel cheated. But you were not cheated… the data just never was trustworthy. To a point, where not even paying for a bloomberg terminal will give you reliable data. Just more reliable data than free services.
Uncertainty is a part of trading. Stocks and Crypto. Free data sources are always flawed.
Yeah, you’re right to point out that Google’s chart labeling was off by a couple days April 15 wasn’t April 17, and now that the data lines up it’s clear the earlier “5 years” tag was inaccurate.