We’re currently under contract on a home. A major factor in our decision to make an offer (and proceed with inspections) was that the listing specifically stated “new sewer line” as part of the improvements. In this area with older homes, that’s a pretty significant claim. Friend bought a house a few blocks away and had to spend a massive amount of money to get the sewer line replaced after purchase 6 months ago so this was top of mind.
After going under contract, we completed inspections and a sewer scope (we opted to get our own even though the seller provided one which now seems sketchy in hindsight but could just be emotions at this point) What we found:
– Still has older piping, including cast iron in sections
– Belly in the line
– Root intrusion / deterioration
Contractors gave us a range of roughly ~$4K–$6K for a targeted repair (not guaranteed long-term), or ~$15K–$20K+ for a full replacement out to the street.
We raised this and requested a credit.
Shortly after, the seller updated the listing language from:
– “new sewer line”
to:
– “sewer line under home replaced”
We have screenshots of both versions.
To me, that’s not just vague marketing language it’s a material change in how the system is being represented. The original wording suggests a full replacement, whereas the updated version clearly narrows it to only part of the line.
The seller also reacted pretty strongly to our request and initially discussed terminating and relisting.
A few questions:
– Is this kind of post-contract listing change normal, or is this more of a CYA move after something was called out?
– Would “new sewer line” reasonably be interpreted as a full replacement, or is that considered flexible language in real estate listings?
– If the seller terminates, is there any realistic path to recover inspection costs if we can show we relied on that representation?
– Does the fact that they changed the listing after the issue was raised strengthen our position in any meaningful way?
Not looking to jump straight into a legal fight, but also trying to understand where the line is between typical listing language and something more problematic.
Appreciate any insight.
Seller changed listing from “new sewer line” to “partial replacement” after inspection. misrepresentation or normal?
byu/urbanhotdogprince inRealEstate
Posted by urbanhotdogprince
3 Comments
Nah they’re correcting an honest mistake
My opinion:
Realtor asked homeowner ‘what updates did you do to the property?’ and assumed the person was truthful and put it in the listing of ‘new sewer line’ . Then after inspection and ‘proof’ of what was actually done, they had to update for accuracy and legality of the situation.
I remember reading a story about home inspections that after a home inspection, the selling RE does NOT ant the report, only wants to know what the buyer wants fixed. If they happen to see the full report then they have to be more honest and clear about what problems the house might have and it causes a lot of problems.
I don’t see how your inspection cost has anything to do with the listing statement. Doubtful you’ll get your money back. You paid for a product (an inspection) and you received one. Why would the seller give you money for a product you received? Even if you did want to fight for the inspection money, is it even worth your time or legal fees?
At this point, just make some decisions – do you want this house? If yes, then accept that they won’t give you any credits, like they said. Are you willing to walk over the sewer line? If yes, then cut your losses and walk away. You can’t force them to sell for an amount they don’t want to.