First of all her fund has severely underperformed the market. Her “innovation fund” has returned -23% over the last 5 years, during arguably the largest innovation cycles in a lifetime.
SP500 has returned 75% during the same time.
Even with that, most of trades are so basic, like someone who reads wall street bets and jumps
On the most ridiculous trades possible.
People say “well if AI bubble pops, she will come out ahead”. Actually her portfolio is filled with such hyper shitcos that a market correction would mean a ton of her holdings probably will go bankrupt.
A monkey flinging shit at a dart board with stock tickers would have outperformed her “innovation fund” in the last 5 years. What a joke. How does this woman have a job.
How does anyone take Cathie Wood seriously?
byu/kadam_ss ininvesting
Posted by kadam_ss
10 Comments
Someone here has clearly read a random walk
The issue is that even trying to do an inverse strategy will fuck you up in the year in which the fund does +150% instead of the usual performance.
She was a genius when everyone was a genius.
It’s crazy how bad she is.
It’s the glasses. You just need thick rimmed glasses and everyone thinks you’re a genius.
The crazy thing is wasn’t she early in nvidia and early-ish on tesla? But she didn’t let them ride. The rebalancing killed her!
She talks pretty smart.
ArkQ is doing well
There is a guy in Rome. Who wears a white robe and Nike sneakers and was elected by a bunch of other guys in robes changing the color of smoke.
Humanity is full of irrational belief systems.
Who hurt you?