A beginner's guide to quantum computing | Shohini Ghose

Here’s a game that a Quantum computer can’t play as it can’t follow the rules…

I have taken this field as my research area….not able to understand 0.1%

The Q-computer prepares the initial state as |Head> and plays first by choosing either to flip the coin or not, but the outcome is not revealed to the opponent – not even to itself! The opponent plays in the second place akin to the Q-computer. Finally, the Q-computer plays, which is also a measurement revealing the outcome … it’s |Head> and hence, the Q-computer wins, not once, but in every round of the game.

*

If the opponent plays first choosing the |Tail>, then obviously, the Q-computer loses every round of the game … which is not all mentioned in this video presentation!!!

*

|Head> is like the |y; spin-up> state, prepared initially by filtering it out from the Stern-Gerlach (SG) apparatus with magnetic field direction along Y-axis, by blocking the |y; spin-down> component.

The |y; spin-up> state then passes through two sequential SG apparatuses [1], but without undergoing any measurement. The magnetic field directions in these two SG apparatuses can be arbitrary.

The output from the 2nd SG apparatus is subjected to a measurement by the Q-computer using the final SG apparatus with magnetic field direction along Y-axis, akin to the initial SG apparatus.

It’s very clear from the quantum formalism that the two sequential SG apparatuses in between the initial and final SG apparatuses, simply play the roles of identity operators [1], i.e., every time the |y; spin-up> state passes-out of any one of the two sequential SG apparatuses, it’s in the same |y; spin-up> state and hence, the final measurement obviously results in the |y; spin-up> state. Actually, the presence or absence of the in-between two SG apparatuses doesn't matter, because, they don’t perform any measurement.

Therefore, the play of Q-computer and the play of opponent are just dubious. In fact, in the case discussed in this video, the Q-computer never performed any quantum computation for winning every round of the game. In other words, it's a game played by the Q-computer with itself = A self-goal (OR) the opponent must be an ignorant to loose every round of the game, because, when the Q-computer shows the initial state, then that's the state to be bet for a win.

Reference

[1] J.J. Sakurai, Modern Quantum Mechanics, p 33 (Addison Wesley, 1994).

Finally Era of star wars started

Tedex walon quantum computer ka baap vedic math hain

With the help of physics equations I will calculated all the outcomes of the casino games 😁😁😁😁

Quantum computing power ko vedic math sey bhi nikal saktey hain so simple

Add uncertainty to our current AI capabilities and you have skynet

Sounds like the computer made it's choice after the player has made all it's choices

What will happen if we don't reveal the initial state of the coin to Quantum Computer (Head in this case), will the results be same or the chances will be 50-50 ?

So how many of these are bullshit?

Need a computer which think, which feels emotions, a computer which produce apps like man . what is man ? Is a machine who produce apps( applications) ,that would be an attainment

now i think the physics lovers would get a hope in their future works!!😄😄😊

Scientists today are acutely aware of the phenomenal capacity of quantum information processing. For this reason they try in a great hurry to construct so-called “quantum computers”.

Since quantum information processing is a natural capability of the Universe since its very beginning, it is highly likely that the Universe itself is already using it.

Unfortunately, the fundamental quantum information processing of the Universe itself is banned from consideration here on Earth.

In the beginning of the 21st century science firmly believes that the basis of all quantum processes in the Universe is chaos.

Belief in chaos and randomness of quantum processes was initiated by some famous people in the past century, who failed to imagine an explanation for “apparently random” behavior of elementary particles such as electrons.

As a result of this glaring lack of imagination, the so-called “uncertainty principle” has been adopted as a foundation of all sciences on Earth.

The uncertainty principle, in its essence, brutally averages-out all traces of the quantum information processing of the Universe and estimates “probabilities” of some primitive set of locally averaged quantum events.

The most famous critic of the uncertainty principle as a way to describe the fundamental activity of the Universe was Albert Einstein, who insisted that “God does not play dice”. Unfortunately, like all his contemporaries, he failed to imagine and propose a plausible explanation for apparently random behavior of elementary particles such as electrons. In the absence of intelligent critics, the uncertainty principle gained the status of a sanctified dogma that is not even allowed to be questioned.

However, quantum-domain information processing in the Universe continues and will continue everywhere, no matter how many authorities and laureates choose to deny it…

If people sent you a square or a circle, how could you program it into your game without knowing its value? I smell a cheat. These results would be too important to be just a boring TED talk. She says during the game the computer generates this fluid quantum bit: This is not quite like the initial game proposed with regular computers where the computer actually flipped ( or not) the coin. I think this is crap.

What if 2 quantum Computer play this coin game against each other. In that case what will be the outcome?

Super amazing!! I absolutely loved the way she conveyed it 💯❤️

Goddamn it. The more I try to understand it, the more I understand I don't understand it. I thought it was just a simple wave collapse and similar to shrodinger's cat thought experiment where mere observation fixes the electron's state. it's far more complicated since the angle of observation also affects the result you get. So now, the cat is not just dead or alive once you open the box, how you open it will determine whether it's alive or dead.

So we're still playing with probabilities in quantum entanglement. It is never a straight zero or one.

Imagine a computer, that was made by Nicola Tesla…
Quantum computer, would be like a 286 os, forever!

I want to see 2 QC playing this game.