Oil, gas and mining

Underwater video shows 50 metre 'missing' section of Nord Stream pipeline after suspected sabotage



A section measuring at least 50 metres (164 feet) is missing from the ruptured Nord Stream 1 gas pipeline in the Baltic Sea, Swedish daily Expressen reported on Tuesday (October 18) after filming what it said were the first publicly released images of the damage.

Swedish police and prosecutors suspect the leaks that emerged on Nord Stream 1 and Nord Stream 2 on September 26 were caused by deliberate subsea blasts, and are investigating the case as an act of gross sabotage.

Expressen’s video, captured with a small remotely operated underwater vehicle, or subsea drone, showed bent metal and a wide-open pipeline in murky waters at the bottom of the Baltic Sea.

Expressen said the video was filmed on Monday (October 17) and recorded at a depth of roughly 80 metres (262 feet).

Reuters could not independently verify that the images published by the newspaper were of Nord Stream 1.

Sweden’s security services said this month they had seized material on site after concluding their investigation.

It was not clear how the Swedish authorities’ crime scene investigation could have altered the area, according to Expressen.

The Swedish navy and the security police declined to comment.

The country’s coast guard was not immediately available for comment.

Copenhagen police, investigating separate ruptures to the two pipelines, on Tuesday said the holes identified on the Danish side of the Baltic Sea maritime border appeared to have been caused by “powerful explosions.”

The Sun newspaper brings you the latest breaking news videos and explainers from the UK and around the world

Become a Sun Subscriber and hit the bell to be the first to know

Read The Sun: http://www.thesun.co.uk
Like The Sun on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/thesun/
Follow The Sun on Twitter: https://twitter.com/TheSun
Subscribe to The Sun on Snapchat: https://www.snapchat.com/discover/The_Sun/1633225139
#ukraine #russia #ukrainenews

37 Comments

  1. 'video shows 50 metre…' again such clickbait, i mean it probably is 50 metre but the vid doesnt 'show' that. I am done with the sun lol, just to get more views from people hoping to see more of what we have already seen from other channels, but turns out to be clickbaited content, again.

  2. So let me get this straight.
    Some guy in a fishing boat puts a cam in the water, like he's going fishing on a Saturday afternoon.
    I see a crack in the ground, and a pipe that has coral growing on it.
    Wouldn't the blast take care of that?
    lies.

  3. Poor countries : USA, we don't have food and home please help us
    USA : sorry buddy you are not supporting us..
    Ukraine : USA, send us trillions to stop aggressor, a threat to west
    USA : we sent already trillions, do you want more? Will send you soon buddy..
    🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂

  4. It looks more like the whole section has been removed, and we know that Russia was the first on the spot.
    What we see here is the junction between 2 pipe sections, not the spot where the explosion happened, so it's tough to conclude anything from the video. The metal parts that look torn outward are probably part of some ring between the 2 sections that are supposed to be welded together, so they could just as easily have been torn off from an explosion happening outside the pipeline. Where and in which state is the section that exploded, why did this submarine explored mostly irrelevant locations for this critical question? Has the missing section been blown apart by the explosion, has it been removed by Russia or some other government? Where is the Kraken?

  5. Where did 50 metres come from? Sure didn't see anything 50 metres in that video….and if this is the Nordstream pipe, why does it look like :1- there is still grass and debris on top of the pipe, which surely would've been blown off by an explosion of that magnitude….2- it looks like the pipe on this video was blown outwards from inside , because of the metal piece still attached on the right side…..3- shouldn't there be a crater in the sea floor if it blew out a 50 metre section of Steel pipe that thick? I don't usually comment but had to state the obvious here

Write A Comment

Share via