Cryptocurrency

Watch Elizabeth Warren Debate Crypto Investor Kevin O'Leary (FTX Congressional Hearing)



At a congressional hearing on the collapse of FTX, watch Senator Elizabeth Warren with crypto investor Kevin O’Leary about whether the same rules regarding money laundering for other currency should also apply to crypto.

Never miss a deal again! See CNET’s browser extension 👉 https://bit.ly/39Ub3bv
Subscribe to our channel: www.youtube.com/channel/UCmKtn_HvpfbTu3QV4lhJIMw

36 Comments

  1. Classic. The dark underbelly huh. The dark underbelly of Elizabeth Warren was very much on show. She had no interest in open dialogue…..her agenda very clearly in motion along with the scripted answers of Professor Allen. And this regardless of what you think of Kevin O'Leary's part in the FTX fiasco and his belief in crypto.

  2. Warren has no idea what she is talking about. give it up. dummy. Terrorism, fraud, and money laundering have been around forever. Crypto is what 18 years old? Just stop dummy

  3. if you Lawmakers made credible realistic crypto regulations, US citizens wouldn't use shady exchanges like FTX to invest. YOUR failure to do your job is the problem.

  4. At time of writing, billions of dollars are stashed in tax havens by all the big company's , including money laundring by white collar criminals. Should we debate money now ?

  5. This is the first I’ve ever agreed with this wacky broad.

    The entire thrust of her argument was accurate and bulletproof.

    Anyone arguing against it is simply wrong

  6. never let a (self induced) crisis go to waste.
    More power to the goverment they do such an amazing job..

    btw.
    while U.S snd most of the world is crashing..
    binance still stands ..wonder why?
    maybe its crypro related?

  7. I think Senator Warren is missing something here, which is the fact that even if governments regulate crypto exchanges with anti-laundering rules, they can never regulate entire blockchains. Blockchains are global and they can operate on their own, without exchanges.

  8. REALLY, can you at least read the script better and try to act it out a little better. Looks like Kevin didn't get a copy of the script in time for the show.

  9. Ah, I hate both of these losers with a passion, but for different reasons. One thing they have in common is that they are grandstanding frauds!

  10. If Alameda took huge losses with users' funds, I'd be interested to know who was at the winning side of that bet, and who in particular took that money home in the end. Who knows, they may have used different accounts to bet against their own Alameda bets, win it with their hidden accounts, withdraw those funds, and then file for bankruptcy once all the money had already left the system.

Write A Comment

Share via