Nord Stream Explosion | Who Blew Up Nordstream Pipeline? | Seymour Hersh Interview | English News

    United States President Joe Biden authorised the Nord Stream gas pipeline sabotage mission before his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin’s invasion of Ukraine, reiterated American investigative journalist Seymour M Hersh in an exclusive conversation with CNN-News18 on Thursday. He also panned mainstream US media and editors for being “partisan”.
    “A single-source story had never been a problem for reporters with credibility earlier because editors trusted them. I’ve published many important stories earlier with single anonymous sources and full credibility. Now the US media has become pro-Trump/anti-Trump/pro-Democrat/anti-Democrat. If 90% of the editors in America disappear, it’ll be better for the press,” said the Pulitzer Prize winner.

    The language of Washington under Biden has become very hostile to Beijing and Moscow, said Hersh, adding that it’s “inappropriate”. “Blinken is so hostile that he won’t go to China because of a balloon,” he said.According to a blog published by Hersh recently, the CIA carried out the Nord Stream sabotage last September at the direction of President Biden. The 85-year-old journalist claims that US Navy divers, operating under cover of a NATO exercise, planted bombs to destroy three of the four Nord Stream pipelines, designed to carry Russian gas to Germany under the Baltic Sea. He quoted an anonymous source “with direct knowledge of the operational planning”.

    The White House has rubbished the article, calling it “utterly false and complete fiction”.

    A report in The New York Times this week said that US officials had seen new intelligence indicating a “pro-Ukrainian group” was responsible for the sabotage.

    However, Hersh said, “Biden authorised the Nord Stream sabotage mission before Putin’s invasion of Ukraine. Biden went to the CIA and said ‘give me an option, what can I do to prevent Putin going to war’. But Putin went ahead anyway. Biden realises that the war for him has domestic political benefit. He also wanted to stop Europe-Russia benefits from Nord Stream. The US was worried about Russian influence on Western Europe, where they had ‘rebuilt democracy’ after World War 2.”He also slammed German chancellor Olaf Scholz. “Scholz is behaving like America’s lapdog. There’s remarkably little US media coverage of Scholz’s visit. Biden basically told Germany ‘I will go ahead and blow up Nord Stream because I want my war and I don’t care if you don’t have gas’. He took away Scholz’s option of not giving arms to Ukraine. The President of the United States took their gas away because he was worried that they weren’t putting enough money into a war he is not going to win. And God knows what’s going to happen, when it gets clearer that he is not going to win. And that’s why this story has traction because my country is really worried about this White House,” he said.

    While hinting at the role of a “pro-Ukrainian group”, the NYT report has said US officials had no evidence implicating President Volodymyr Zelensky in the pipeline bombing, and it did not identify the source of the intelligence or the group involved. Intelligence suggested that the perpetrators behind the sabotage were “opponents of President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia”, it added.“The only thing I can say is that its story is crazy that… just what… a group of Ukrainians? Do you know what it takes to use the seafloor to blow up a pipeline that is covered by a concrete shield? You know that much power, the skill you have to have…the team that was involved that started working with the CIA and other agencies,” said Hersh. “They practised for months and they got the best divers they can get from a very superior training centre in Florida. Blowing up something is easy but blowing it up correctly and safely is hard. The idea that Ukrainians could do it is silly stuff. You really think Putin who had shut down one pipeline is going to blow up the other one? Who thought that? Nobody. Who else could have done it? I can’t think of who? Pakistan? The problem with the story is they never acknowledge my story.”

    #nordstream #nordstream2 #englishnews #news18

    46 Comments

    1. The host used the term “amateurs” where the operation would obviously not have been possible without unprecedented strategic and operational skill?

    2. yah who did it? latest matrix govt mafia LIE is rediculous…. there is a spy in the white house…Ametuers had the timing bombs…deep in the sea….they think we are stupid dont they?

    3. LOOK I know as much as you as to WHO BLEW UP the Nordstream Pipeline. BUT after what Biden himself promised on public TV, I have very strong suspicions. Look they've.EXICUTED individuals with MUCH LESS circumstantial; evidence.

    4. The Biden administration clearly blew up the pipeline. Which is weird because he’s the one who approved it. But hey, this is all part of the plan to launch their fake World War 3 so they can realign the world how they want it.

      If Ukraine is really a “war zone”, why on earth would the current president of the United States get on a plane and fly right into it? Think, McFly.

    5. When a so called "great"(?) power acts like this, doing a so despicable and coward act, it only means that it is in despair, feeling already the taste of defeat.

    6. Joe Biden said that he was going to shut down the Nordstrom pipeline whatever it would take. Speech from January last year. His corruption with China is the reason why.

    7. Okay here's one for you guys again Trump stopped Russia from building the pipeline number to Biden left thumb build-it number three Ukraine president zelensky ask somebody not to let it be built tell me am I wrong The Binding White House let that happen which one of these three are at fault I don't care whether you're a Democrat or Republican tell me who do you think is at fault if you guess the man in the middle you got it right

    8. How anyone could believe it was a band of Ukrainians lol but guess what people will believe it! This was a specialized job done between US UK and the Nordic states all of which don't want Germany to have cheap Russian gas.

    9. The only qualified divers with the expert military sabotage training would be from the US military.
      Russia would not jeopardize it's source of income.
      Ukraine military most likely does not the expertise.

      Who benefits?

      The most likely scenario is that the US would reduce the Russian PNG, hike up the price and sell its own PNG at 400-700% the market price.

      If the EU countries would suffer the cold winter and high price, it would also benefit the US. In geopolitics, the US wants EU to be kept from becoming too strong in economic and military strength.

      Otherwise, the EU would be the future,
      a threat to the US world hegemony.

    10. I had not earlier seen all of Hersh interview, and one of the things I missed was, that not only should Norway have OK'd the operation, but also Denmark.

      I was 100% sure before, but should there have been a trifle of doubt, with the allegation that Denmark also should have said OK, I know it's a fabrication.

      Remember, those who did it, and those who did not, each know that. Therefore, if Denmark approved of this, our own pipelines, power cables, communication cables, would be at risk. And we have plenty: We produce oil and gas in the North Sea in pipelines to shore. Wind farms have power lines to shore. Many thousands of wind turbines in the North Sea planned for the future. If we should approve of sabotage of Russian pipes, it would be suicide. 

      Russian ships has already for years been snooping around and mapping things, we see them regularly. Also in recent weeks, mapping Dutch off shore installations. It is not a new worry. If Russia new they did not do this, and it was substantiated without doubt is was us, we would be in for eternal  retribution, especially now that we do not buy their energy anymore.  

      People point out that US has been negative about NS pipes for a long time, but seems to escape, EU leaders have also not wanted these pipes! Many have been pointing out for years the danger with them. 

      It is not that we have excluded the possibility of buying Russian oil and gas per say, but the fact Germany tied us to Russia with only pipes. Oil is bought in tankers going to oil terminals – no problem. 

      Had we built LNG terminals before, that would have been just fine to buy Russian gas that way, because tankers from everywhere could have docked there. But with only gas in pipes from Russia, that means only Russian gas arrives.

      Now Germany has been building LNG terminals in record speed, what I and others have been suggesting for years. But there was a stubborn naive woman in charge in Berlin for many years, and things like that comes at a price. No good thing goes unpunished.

      However, the end result is worst for Russia – they thought they had leverage over us, and sure enough they had briefly – but likewise, we had leverage over them in the long term, as we could simply stop buying the energy from them, and that's what we have done. They thought we would rush in to repair them, and in the meantime they could sell gas in the new NS2 line, which we had refused to open, at half capacity, as they conveniently spared 1 tube – that would keep the price up. They miscalculated again – we do not need it. 

      I of course regret not to be of comfort for those folks in the US, who hate their own country, and so desperately wanted it to be them. Sorry guys, it was not you.

    11. I've met Navy SEAL divers in Panama learning to do these things and I've been to their training areas and I know for a fact that this is how they do things. Deep-diving past 200 ft requires heliox mixture special rebreather systems and decompression Chambers. It's impossible for amateur divers using scuba to do anything like this.

    12. It is really crazy how far ahead of msm you can be on hearing the truth if you just go on r/conspiracy for news…
      Go on there right now read a few threads and then just wait a few days or months or if its pandemic related a few more years ;3
      I still remember msm running with the story that Putin blew up the nordstream 2.
      meanwhile the usa and globalists continue to break treaties and destroy infastructure that could lead to ww3, k3k

    13. the consequences and implications are that we can NEVER trust the government of the USA.

      i love the american people! i can’t condone the foreign policy of these warmongers… if it’s not Afghanistan, or Libya or Iraq (twice) it’s other acts of international terrorism 😢

      we need a new world order !

    14. Thus old guy is a complete fool! He is tricked into this stupid conspiracy story because of his anti-US tendency.
      A simple question can expose the poor lie. There are 4 pipelines US must blow, 3 were blown up. Where is the 4th bomb?

      The so-called informer deliberately fed the stupid story to the 86 year old man, knowing he has no way to verify and would publish anyway owing to his self-importance and arrogance, and loving conspiracy theory in old age. A old fool.

    15. Seymour Hersh is totally wrong and only seeks some publicity. He has no proof, a single anonymous phone call ???

    16. On 26 September at 02:03 local time (CEST), an explosion was detected originating from Nord Stream 2; a pressure drop in the pipeline was reported and natural gas began escaping to the surface southeast of the Danish island of Bornholm. Moments before a Navy P-8 Poseidon was observed within range making a run on Nord Stream just prior to the explosions… The U.S. Navy's P-8A Poseidon maritime patrol aircraft now have another weapon in their arsenal, the High Altitude Anti-Submarine Warfare Weapon Capability, or HAAWC. The service has now declared initial operational capability, or IOC, with HAAWC, which transforms air-dropped Mk 54 lightweight anti-submarine torpedoes into long-range, quickly-delivered standoff weapons …

      Read more

    Leave A Reply
    Share via