New Weapons Emerging in Multiple Wars (Global Connections)

    [Music]
    welcome back to think Tech I’m J Fel
    this is Global Connections today we’re
    going to talk about new weapons new
    weapons emerging in multiple Wars
    there’s nothing like a war to develop
    new weapons that’s where they get
    perfected and for this discussion we
    have Carl Baker the senior advisor of
    the Pacific Forum uh to help us
    understand what weapons have emerged and
    what weapons are likely to emerge as we
    go forward uh both in Israel and in
    Ukraine welcome to the show Carl good be
    back Jay it’s a a topic that I don’t
    spend a lot of time thinking about but
    it’s it’s an important topic because we
    certainly are in the midst of Wars these
    days and it doesn’t look like that’s
    going to stop anytime
    soon yeah well you know back back in
    October 7th we were really surprised to
    see mean I was I think a lot of people
    were gliders gliders when when’s the
    last time we saw gliders in the war um
    and we saw these techniques with the
    motorcycles that the kind of technique
    War by motorcycle war by hostage taking
    uh War by atrocity
    War by tunnels this is all kind of new
    um but but since that time we’ve seen a
    lot more weapons that have been I don’t
    want to say
    underground that have emerged overground
    and and these wars both of these wars
    have demonstrated at least to a
    substantial degree um that there’s
    weapons development going on in the
    world not just in the in the in the
    Waring factions but elsewhere uh who
    sell weapons uh or sometimes give them
    away um to the Waring faction so what we
    have here is a a crucible of new weapons
    and I suggest it’s important for us to
    look at that because a these wars aren’t
    finished there may be more weapons come
    out maybe more in the pipeline and B new
    weapons especially sophisticated
    high-tech weapons change the
    possibilities for future Wars um so uh
    this will you know inform us as to what
    will happen in the future of future Wars
    so what are you what are your thoughts
    what are the most remarkable weapons
    that you have
    them well I mean all the Ultimate Weapon
    of course is the nuclear the the
    hydrogen bomb you know I mean that’s
    that’s the one that has sort of changed
    the definition of of warfare in some
    ways that it’s the ultimate Ultimate
    Weapon that we have the capacity to
    eliminate civilization as we know it and
    you know and that has has spawned a
    whole a whole several Generations now of
    of weapons that are are much less
    powerful yet they’re more sophisticated
    in the sense that they go faster they’re
    more lethal they’re they’re more more
    autonomous and you you have you have all
    these weapons for example you know the
    the introduction of drones has changed
    Warfare and the not not everything is
    high-tech you know a drone isn’t isn’t
    all that sophisticated and I mean I
    think the the remarkable thing that I
    saw just in the last two weeks is the
    attack from Iran you know in in in two
    ways one is the fact that Iran was able
    to to launch sophisticated missiles
    drones and all kinds of stuff at Israel
    and Israel managed to eliminate all of
    that with some help from friends but for
    the most part it was it was the Israeli
    uh Iron Dome system a defensive system
    that actually stop all these all these
    projectiles from entering Israel so you
    know so I think that’s what’s happening
    I think with with which you think about
    the the nature of warfare and the nature
    of these weapons is yes you still have
    the the Ultimate Weapon nuclear weapon
    as the most powerful and the one that’s
    still in limited dis limited Supply to a
    few major actors in the world and that’s
    why we are still concerned about nuclear
    proliferation when when you see a
    country like North Korea developing
    nuclear weapons the potential for Iran
    developing nuclear weapons you know we
    we we really are concerned about that
    because that that raises the risk of the
    end of civilization you know the worst
    kind of War you can have but then what
    you also have is you have War Warfare on
    a much smaller scale where you you can
    have somebody like the houthi rebels uh
    knocking out or capturing ships of
    threatening threatening commercial ships
    uh moving through that that area of the
    world you know so so you have a wide
    range of weapons and a lot W wide range
    of applications of those weapons that
    that make it really difficult to figure
    out what do you focus on you know if you
    look at the Americans the Americans are
    are stuck with a bunch of Legacy systems
    like old submarines that are becoming
    more and more vulnerable to to sensors
    that can that can figure out where they
    are in the ocean they’re still stuck
    with a bunch of old bomber aircraft that
    are are seemingly less useful than they
    were 50 years ago 60 years ago when they
    were originally built you know and and
    the army of course still has tanks for
    you know unclear reasons sometimes of uh
    what are they going to do with these
    when they’re really trying to fight a
    much more mobile Force than than they
    were back in the days of the fold the
    capap and and the potential Soviet
    invasion of of Europe
    I get some reactions from what you’ve
    said um one of them is that um these
    weapons we we talk about we worry about
    roots on the ground we worry about
    sending our soldiers into Harvest way um
    as troopers on the ground oldfashioned
    World War II style um but in fact um you
    know it’s changing because the weapons
    are long distance weapons and the
    targets are different targets the
    targets are largely civilian you want to
    demoralize your enemy by hitting
    civilian Target you know that’s what in
    large part that’s what Vladimir Putin is
    doing and the other the other point that
    comes to my mind anyway is you talk
    about nuclear weapons and Putin has
    threatened to use you know arms and for
    that matter tactical nuclear weapons but
    that kind of uh you know that’s not the
    kind of deterrence that really works
    anymore because everybody recognizes
    what you have to say namely that it
    would ruin the world for years for
    centuries or ruin civilization if you
    got into a real Donny Brook about that
    um what what it means is that no do not
    have moral justification for using
    nuclear weapons like ever um
    but every Everything short of a nuclear
    weapon is okay even Perhaps Perhaps a
    tactical nuclear weapon but in any event
    these very sophisticated Hightech and
    very lethal rockets and missiles and
    what have you uh that that are set off
    on civilian targets that’s under the The
    Cloud of the nuclear
    possibility that seems to be okay you
    know I mean so so the deterrence feature
    has changed and if you can figure out a
    very dangerous Lethal Weapon it’s okay
    because it’s not it’s not nuclear
    necessarily the other thing is uh you
    know least this has surprised Us in both
    the leers of War um I don’t know if we
    can still say that Ukraine is um it’s
    got a lot of sophisticated weapons but
    it still has some um and it will
    probably have more and it stands for the
    proposition that even a a country that
    doesn’t have all that much technology
    can build weapons and and I mean I I I I
    distinguish Ukraine say from the hotis
    because the hotis are getting their
    weapons and the from elsewhere from Iran
    for example maybe North Korea um but the
    Ukraine is really not getting them
    outside Ukraine is actually building
    some itself uh which you have to give
    them credit but that is an element it’s
    a feature so things have changed you
    know civilian targets and longdistance
    weapons A Thousand Miles for Iran that’s
    different and and the war has changed
    because you know you you don’t have a
    boundary
    where some guys are on one side of the
    trench and some guys are on the other in
    fact you could shoot at them from a
    thousand miles away with all kinds of
    weapons so you know I suggest to you
    that this means um that we can have wars
    where they’re not even close anymore
    they just take a pot shot over a
    thousand miles and um do it by remote
    it’s different now and and this is all
    new is well it’s it’s new but it’s not
    new I mean you say we don’t have trench
    work anymore but fact is is that in
    Ukraine we we have that also you know if
    you if you look at what’s happening on
    the ground in the dbas today it it is it
    is trench working you know so so you
    have that but you also have all these
    other compounding kinds of of weapons up
    there also so it it you know where do
    you where do you put your energy where
    do you put your emphasis when you have
    that sort of that sort of threat
    environment that you have everything
    from hence hand combat to to the the
    Hypersonic missile that you know arrives
    3,800 miles an hour you know so so you
    know so I mean you it really becomes
    complicated and it becomes a matter of
    allocation resources of where do you
    want to put your money where do you want
    what is most important to and and what’s
    most important today may not be that
    important five years from now and that’s
    the that’s the challenge because these
    systems don’t get developed overnight
    they get developed over over spans of
    decades you know so so you’re talking
    about you know the fifth generation
    fighter aircraft or the sixth generation
    fighter aircraft those things are are
    they take 20 30 years to develop you
    know so so it really becomes complicated
    and you know then again as I was talking
    about these old Legacy systems you know
    once you’ve got one you really kind of
    hate to let it go you know you might
    need it for something you know that you
    don’t foresee so you know so you’ve got
    you know I mean the classic example is
    B52 bomber built in the 50s you know and
    we’re still thinking about how we’re
    going to put new engines on it and make
    it a make it a platform into 2050 you
    know so a 100y old airplane that’s still
    flying around trying to trying to
    fulfill some military
    purp well you know the cost feature is
    always in there and something it takes
    decades to perfect is very costly costly
    to design and test and manufacture and
    so forth but some of these weapons
    including weapons that have been shown
    to be very effective are cheap um you
    know for example you know you can have a
    missile um that costs a million dollars
    a pot and the Taurus missile we talking
    before about Germany is in a
    collaboration with Sweden and they
    developed this Forest missile which is a
    missile that a plane will have to carry
    and drop as an air to ground missile it
    cost 1.1 to 1.6 million per copy um and
    and and and a small um in a small
    country like a David colas match uh
    doesn’t have the funds um to afford a
    whole lot of those nor doesn’t have the
    funds to afford you know the the
    airplane platform for that on the other
    hand these Glide bombs that Iran has
    developed and the rockets that are being
    used and the drawings are cheap they’re
    not anywhere near Millions they’re you
    know they’re Maybe tens of thousands and
    they’re very effective and very
    frightening uh and they will be better
    as time goes on you know there I think
    so the idea is cost is important and
    cleverness is important and deployment
    is important and you can you can
    actually have a David Goliath kind of
    you know situation uh where the little
    guy has clever high-tech um built- at
    home weapons and that are a match uh or
    at least a deterrent for some of the
    heavyduty expensive weapons from a you
    know a big war
    power yeah well sure and and to go
    further you you don’t even need to have
    military weapons anymore you know you
    have so much dual use equipment out
    there that you can use in Warfare in
    hybrid Warfare you have information
    systems you know it’s about connectivity
    and it’s about being able to to to fix
    figure out what the other guy is doing
    faster than he can you know and and it
    all becomes uh driven by by the by the
    Precision by the speed and and by the
    connectivity of of those weapons and so
    yeah so it it it just makes it more and
    more complicated so you can’t you can’t
    just build an Arsenal and say I’m done
    you have to continue to figure out how
    your component is going to use defensive
    weapons to counter your offensively and
    and you know the and defense has found
    ways to do zone defense and and
    penetration uh actions are are defeated
    by by building but as you say the Iron
    Dome in Israel is a perfect example of
    how these these weapons are effective
    but they’re not effective if you can if
    you could build a system that actually
    protects you like like the iron dull and
    you know and that’s where the the the
    small country Israel can actually build
    that system you can’t build that system
    in United States I mean we’ve tried you
    know with with the intercontinental
    ballistic missile defense systems but
    it’s really complicated when you’ve got
    thousands and thousands of miles of of
    of border that you cannot
    protect Yeah you mentioned connectivity
    and I think it’s important to just take
    a moment on that a lot of these weapons
    long distance weapons um are more
    effective if they rely on the internet
    uh on satellite connectivity and uh
    early on in the in the uh Ukraine war
    Elon Musk turned off his uh his his
    satellite system for Ukraine which was
    an outrage because he made a decision
    that he really would rather support
    Russia than Ukraine and he turned it off
    and Ukraine was left high and dry
    without the benefit of the uh satellite
    navigation um and so that becomes
    another feature and a controlling
    feature in some cases and I I don’t know
    if there’s a replacement for that or an
    alternative for that because if you’re
    talking long distance you and uh you
    know neral guidance or some kind of
    Internet guidance you you really do have
    to have a connectivity so that that is a
    factor going forward don’t you think oh
    sure absolutely and and and that’s why
    you know one of the latest areas of of
    uh development is space you know is is
    coloring coloring satellites in space
    you know remember what is it’s about
    what maybe almost 20 years ago now that
    that Russia tested its anti-satellite
    you know and it it knocked out a
    satellite and spewed debris all over uh
    lower space you know and everybody was
    outrage but don’t think that that
    development has stopped you know you you
    have to know that everybody is busy
    thinking about how do you how do you
    eliminate all those satellites that are
    flying low earth orbit uh observing
    what’s happening on the battlefield and
    and guiding weapons and all these
    autonomous uh vehicles that are being
    being developed so yeah it’s
    connectivity is important and and the
    ability to destroy the other the the
    opponents connectivity is is a critical
    component of of defensive Wars yeah and
    you know the United States spends
    something over 900 billion dollars per
    anom on on defense I think a substantial
    amount of that goes to research and
    development of weapons as it should um
    and some of those weapons have been
    rolled out and some have not a couple I
    have noticed that just to mention to you
    uh and it started in Israel Israel was
    had the publicity at first over a laser
    beams a laser weapon um which could
    actually be a defensive weapon against
    missiles um but it could be an offensive
    weapon too and it required a certain
    amount of energy but it was actually
    much cheaper to to send a laser beam out
    and to send a a big missile out um and
    and this is like a a year ago maybe a
    little less um and you know it was
    impressive that they had gotten to the
    point where it was very nearly a weapon
    well a month ago I I saw something to
    the same effect um on the part of the
    United States that we were also doing
    laser beams uh and that it was
    potentially a weapon but it wasn’t
    really ready for prime time um I think
    it’s probably gone far enough now that
    it’s had this publicity that it will be
    ready for prime time and when it gets
    ready for Prime Time a it’s going to
    change the calculus on cost and B you
    know it we don’t know how powerful it
    could be we don’t know exactly the
    circumstances in which it would be
    deployed um so that you know that’s
    really Hightech the other thing I
    noticed that was Hightech and I’ll stop
    in a minute here is these assault
    weapons you know back in the day with
    the M14 it was pretty primitive compared
    to what they have now they have all
    these scopes on them electronic Scopes
    and the last thing I saw was they have
    bullets that are smart and the bullets
    you know you aim the bullet at something
    and if the bullet goes off course it
    corrects itself uh that is really
    something so your target is had the cake
    had the cookie um if you aim properly to
    begin with uh that’s quite remarkable so
    in street fighting I don’t know if the
    Israelis have this I don’t think so but
    the US is working on it and would be you
    know helpful with the troops on the
    ground is um so in terms of you know the
    advanced weapons and they are probably
    more you know remember we have we have
    heard about um Sinister attacks on
    American diplomats and Military uh
    officials using
    microwave and disconcerting them and
    disorienting them and making them ill
    and all that um you got it’s been
    covered by 60 Minutes a couple three
    times already um and the defense
    department is um you know not denying it
    so I think it’s out
    there and um we don’t have it yet
    doesn’t seem like but somebody else does
    and query whether that’s going to be
    another kind of weapon to discon dis
    disc
    disconcert your adversary I’m sure it’s
    in the pipeline somewhere don’t you
    think well there’s something there’s
    something you’re talking about the Havis
    right yes yes yeah yeah I I in fact I
    saw a news article just the other day
    that said that there was
    a something happened when Kamala Harris
    made her visit to East Asia recently
    that there was some people who were with
    her that were suffering from The Havana
    syndrome so whatever whatever it is uh
    it it hasn’t been clear and and they’ve
    done several in the government itself
    has done several investigations Beyond
    60 Minutes you know the government self
    has has tried to figure out what it is
    because and the reason it’s called
    syndrome is because it was first noticed
    in Cuba and so you know that sort of
    suggests who may be developing this
    thing I suppose uh you know but there’s
    something something out there whether
    it’s microwave they they really haven’t
    figured out what it is or at least if
    they have they haven’t told the rest of
    and so you know there’s always that
    possibility too is that there there is
    probably good understanding of what it
    is but it is something that they really
    don’t want to have
    everybody understand so these kinds of
    things happen all the time I the general
    comment that I’ll make about microwaves
    and directed energy and all that stuff
    you know all this new
    technology one of the things people do
    when there’s a new emerging technology
    is they
    say how can what military application
    does this technology have and and some
    of it works out well some of it does you
    know when you look at lasers I remember
    in the 1990s when we were looking at
    putting lasers on a 747 aircraft to
    shoot down missiles you know that that
    program eventually withered away it
    didn’t it just they couldn’t make it
    work you know the missile defense system
    you know that we’ve been working on for
    for years and years that they every once
    in a while you’ll see that they’re
    launching missiles out of or or you
    missiles out of fudul or out of out of
    kaai and and fraudulent for that matter
    you know that that they’re still working
    on this stuff and and it’s you know
    years and years that they they try to
    develop it and at some point they they
    say this just isn’t going to work so
    it’s always difficult to tell what
    technology is going to emerge as the new
    successful weapon I think I think today
    you know the the big ones are are any
    kind of autonomous you know the sort of
    dystopian view of the future where where
    robots are attacking each other and
    turning on its Masters and all that sort
    of stuff that we’ve seen in the movies
    for well I think they get it from the
    movies don’t they that’s that’s probably
    where the concept comes
    from yeah and and then the other one of
    course is is the Hypersonic you know the
    I think there’s you know there’s a fear
    that Hypersonic weapons are going to you
    know make so much defense so many defens
    systems irrelevant that there is a very
    big concern about about the the capacity
    of hypersonics to to change the nature
    of warfare you know but these things
    they end up it it ends up always being
    slower than what you think you know the
    the whole the whole idea of autonomy
    like me say it’s been around since the
    50s you know and and it’s it’s maybe
    closer today than it was in 1950 when we
    had the the stoic movies of of the
    robots roaming the Earth and and that
    you know but but it’s still it takes a
    long time for this this technology to
    develop and in the meantime people are
    developing defense systems to defeat it
    so you know so now you’ve got you’ve got
    all these drones that are moving from
    Iran into Israel and long behold they
    all get shot on in the
    air yeah well I me know defense is part
    of of War also and just as we talk about
    weapons we we should you know consider
    the advances in defense and they are in
    do and other there more it’s more than
    the iron doll as we saw last weekend
    they have the Israelis have other
    systems too that are defensive against
    missiles but you know there’s one thing
    that strikes me from what’s Happening
    Here and that is you know essential
    creativity cleverness you know I
    mentioned the gliders it’s pretty clever
    uh you think about it you know nobody
    ever thought of that before and the
    helicopter in the Red Sea with the with
    the hotis coming down uh with a
    helicopter and taking over a huge big
    ship um hey that’s that’s quite
    impressive and all it was was an
    ordinary helicopter and a bunch of guys
    with automatic rifles um that was
    impressive and then you have you have U
    you know other smart clever things that
    that have happened that um you know that
    that are of great concern and and what I
    think what I what I Come Away with is
    that it’s not only the weapons it’s the
    use of the weapons it’s the clever
    deployment of the weapons uh that that
    is a concern and there’s plenty of room
    for that you know there’s always room
    for for cleverness I would say and we
    are seeing
    that yeah I mean you got you’ve got you
    know you’ve got the hardware you’ve got
    the software and then you’ve got the
    user interface with those two systems
    and and there’s a lot of room for for
    creativity when it comes to how do you
    want to how do you want to kill people
    you know unfortunately that that that is
    very much a a industry that seems to
    thrive uh over the century and it it
    never seems to run out of new
    ideas yeah let’s look at the tunnels the
    tunnels in you know Hamas land um you
    know hundreds of kilometers and tunnels
    and I don’t think the Israelis took that
    seriously enough they knew it was there
    they didn’t know the extent of it they
    didn’t know what could be done and the
    things that could happen the training uh
    that you know that that’s just clever
    because it cost a lot of money and then
    and let me say that this is kind of a
    weapon because you talk about asymmetric
    Wars and all that propaganda uh is a
    weapon of course we know um and um you
    know social media the way propaganda is
    a weapon and trying to trying to use
    proxies that’s a weapon of course and
    try to you know um ruin your ad AR’s
    public relations by lying about what
    your adversary is doing you know that’s
    a weapon um and so you know I mean I
    think there’s there’s all kinds of new
    stuff that’s coming around and one of
    them uh and I’ll treat it as a sort of a
    system rather than a weapon is taking
    hostages in large
    numbers that is going to happen again
    brl yeah well I mean but hostage taking
    certainly isn’t new I mean it’s it’s
    been around for for a long time and you
    know and and so yeah I mean prisoners of
    war in some sense are are hostens you
    know and so it it it is it’s something
    that that has gotten a lot of attention
    in the in the media but yeah I I mean
    what what you’re describing you know
    this hybrid Warfare idea is the Chinese
    call it informationized Warfare you know
    and and and and it is you you have the
    full spectrum and you know and that’s
    what’s making it more and more difficult
    I think to control the technology you
    know back in the back in the Cold War it
    was simple we denied we tried to deny so
    the Soviet Union technology because
    technology was the basis for developing
    weapons now so much of the technology is
    dual use multi-use Omni use whatever you
    want to call it you know that that you
    can’t simply control all the information
    system you know so now you’re worried
    about about you know kill switches and
    back doors into into systems and all
    this and once you start doing that in in
    the era of connectivity of information
    based Warfare it becomes almost
    impossible to control that technology so
    we still have control you know trade
    control regimes out there but they’ve
    become somewhat irrelevant because you
    can’t control all the technology and you
    can’t control what technology is going
    to be useful going back to your idea of
    people being creative and how to use
    things that probably weren’t intended to
    kill people in killing people you know
    so I think that that yeah that’s part of
    the part of
    the vagueness that’s that’s intruding on
    war planet is is how do you stop all
    this all this all these systems from
    being used against you in in in a
    Warfare situation yeah and and and don’t
    forget the um you know the intelligence
    and Espionage aspect of this I keep
    thinking of that those balloons over the
    United States they Carl I’m here to tell
    you they weren’t
    weather they were not weather balles and
    and they’ll be more of them and there’ll
    be more countries using and they’re
    clearly they’re trying to you know get
    data on us just as China is trying to
    get data in so many other ways and that
    data is useful on a strategic
    basis um you can say oh they’re just
    they’re collecting everything about you
    would need where we were born we went to
    school who knows what but when you take
    that data in you know in sort of a large
    language model uh for millions of people
    that becomes a a tremendous asset if
    you’re going to go to war likewise if
    you’re able to uh you know get get into
    a utility plant
    plant somewhere in the country and bring
    it down on a given day that’s a a
    tremendous weapon uh using the similar
    systems so I think the internet is a
    it’s it’s it’s it’s it’s of interest on
    a number of levels but it has to be
    considered in both the making offensive
    and defensive moves and both sides all
    sides have to be working on
    that but I I’ll I’ll I’ll agree with you
    on your second Point your first point
    I’m going to say that you’re you’re a
    victim of of of a paranoia that I think
    is
    overrun in other words I think you know
    I think the the the fear of the large
    language model stealing my personal data
    is is somewhat somewhat overwrought in
    in American we will uh I do think though
    certainly certainly I I agree with you
    that there is a huge threat to
    infrastructure with information War I I
    I I I fully agree with you that that I
    think that’s a that’s a threat that has
    really been overlooked and when you
    think about you know what would what
    would happen today if Honolulu suddenly
    didn’t have electricity you
    know or or didn’t have a water system or
    or the water system got polluted or
    something or it didn’t have
    telecommunication yeah or or didn’t have
    didn’t have the internet yeah yeah I
    mean it’s it’s hard to it’s hard to
    imagine that 30 30 years ago yeah 30
    years ago we really didn’t think much
    about the
    internet no but we were totally
    dependent on it now and and so you know
    to me and this is what I would like to
    get to here at the end of our time um
    but you know things have changed and yes
    there are still trenches yes there is
    still bullets and soldiers shooting at
    their AB Aries from short distances um
    yes there is still artillery is still
    relevant um bombs are still relevant
    however the nature of War has changed
    and if you look at what’s going on in
    these two Wars these two active kinetic
    Wars actually I shouldn’t say kinetic
    because they’re asymmetric is what they
    are they’re hybrid Wars in every way and
    if we make a list of all the aggressive
    Maneuvers and weapons and you know
    procedures and techniques that we seen
    used and developed we say to ourselves
    you know it’s really different now um
    you know World War II would be different
    World War I would be very different
    Korean War would be different um because
    of these different weapons it would be
    at distance uh it might involve germ
    warfare uh it might involve um you know
    this kind of bring down the utility
    Warfare um so and and it might might be
    smaller Wars smaller Wars more focused
    Wars wars focused on civilians Wars
    focused on morale wors focused on
    forcing people to give up or give up
    land um the world is never going to be
    without Wars I’m sorry part of the human
    condition look at look at history
    everywhere you know people say oh I want
    peace well the fact is that human beings
    get into Wars they have since the day of
    the stal the Stone Age uh that’s going
    to that’s not going to stop but the
    nature of the wars is changing rapidly
    because of these new weapons and
    techniques don’t you agree sure I do I
    mean I I I think that uh that they
    they’ve changed and they haven’t changed
    that’s you know that’s the that’s the
    big conundra is is going back to where
    we started this conversation you know
    there’s still nuclear weapons up and
    they still have the couple countries in
    this world still have the ability to
    Simply eliminate civilization and and
    that that be that should be frightening
    but then you look at the other end of
    that Spectrum where you have minor local
    Wars you know local war is a big war if
    you’re local it doesn’t matter it
    doesn’t matter how many other people are
    die the fact is is that you are and so
    you know you know so so you you how do
    you how do you
    really plan for this kind of situation
    where you where you have to be prepared
    for localized War
    hybrid informationalized kind of war and
    all the way up to a to a a global
    cration that uh that simply destroys
    the yeah and it could happen I mean on
    our watch right here right now I mean
    for example you have Iran try to run all
    these proxy terrorist groups um that’s a
    new kind of War we haven’t seen that
    we’ve seen proxies all agree but um we
    haven’t seen proxies to the extent that
    we’re seeing them now where you have one
    country a a state a nation state
    presumably with some responsibility for
    taking care of its citizens and then you
    have terror groups uh that are
    completely free and independent and
    murderous uh and have one controlling
    the other this is like the
    breakdown of of Na of Nations uh that’s
    different and war is being done through
    practices those things are different and
    and you you spoke of nuclear and yes and
    nuclear is always with us now now but
    here is a rogue nation which is
    essentially a terrorist State okay and I
    mean I’d like to talk to some Iranians
    about that but they’re not available to
    me right now um and and and they will
    soon have a bomb and they hate Israel
    and they want to destroy Israel and
    whatever you know all the whole country
    from the river it to the sea with the
    bomb you have a whole different kettle
    of fish when it’s a rogue terrrace State
    it’s not that everybody who has the bomb
    is responsible or understands the
    meaning of deterrence some countries
    like Iran do not this is another level
    of risk isn’t
    it well sure I mean but any any state
    that has nuclear weapons can be can be
    portrayed as a risk to the rest of
    civilization simply because there are
    nuclear weapons that that can be
    launched and I I understand that that
    there’s a sense that Iran is a riskier
    state I would say that uh North Korea
    probably falls into that category uh
    when you look at at Pakistan uh you know
    how how stable is that government I mean
    the real concern is is the stability of
    the government and the and the
    commitment to the nonpol eration treaty
    that you know that that says we won’t do
    that uh you know it really we’re basing
    this on a on a treaty that people
    somewhat adhere to others say you don’t
    adhere to it because you’re not actually
    dismantling your weapons you know so so
    yeah I I understand that it’s not it’s
    not pleasant to talk about the nuclear
    aspect and certainly you know as as Iran
    develops its its nuclear capabilities we
    have to be concerned about it but is
    Israel a responsible nuclear weapon
    state well we’ve we’ve thought we
    thought so but U right now we question
    Netanyahu I suppose yeah on the other
    hand he he is responsible to his War
    cabinet I don’t I don’t think he can go
    off half dark but let me let me ask you
    one last question here it seems to me
    that what we’ve been talking about with
    all these weapons and wars and you know
    that the kind of attitude that countries
    have uh both aggressive countries and
    defensive countries what they have right
    now public statements they make the
    threats they
    make um you know it seems to me and
    you’re in much better position that to
    speak on this that I am we are in an
    arms race we are in a global arms race
    um that has come about perhaps access
    accelerated by these two Wars uh but in
    any event we are uh people are
    developing arms they’re learning more
    about arms they’re manufacturing arms we
    take Germany for example it’s it’s
    revived it’s ammunition manufacturing
    it’s weapons manufacturing and I think
    there are a number of other countries
    France is another example of that um so
    you know when you start taking off all
    the countries that are building
    designing using exporting selling what
    have you um to so many places in the
    world it doesn’t make the world a
    quieter place it makes the world in
    general a more dangerous place and it is
    an arms race
    is I I you I mean there’s a specific
    definition for arms race and so I I’m
    not sure I want to say there is an arms
    race there’s always been an arms race in
    the sense that everyone has has
    consistently tried to develop a better
    weapon a faster weapon a more efficient
    weapon a a a clever weapon a clever use
    of a weapon you know all the things we
    just talked about I think that that that
    is that is the case so if that’s what we
    want to call an arms race then yeah I
    think there is an arms race uh you know
    but it also it also goes back to to your
    sort of
    U well I’ll say your statement that well
    there’s always been Wars so we have to
    prepare for war you know oh no I only
    said there’s always been War I didn’t
    say we have to prepare for
    well but but if you if there’s always
    been War then then I think it logically
    follows that you need to prepare for
    them too okay okay so you know I mean so
    so I mean that that is the mindset that
    that is a deeply ingrained mindset and
    it’s deeply ingrained in the idea of
    National Security you know so if you
    want to look at at how do we how do we
    escape this system you know ultimately
    you have to start looking at what is the
    source of this conflict and of course
    the source is the socioeconomic entity
    called the state because everything is
    done everything that’s done in preparing
    for war is done in the name of National
    Security and National Security is by
    definition security of my
    state and yeah you know and so you know
    so so yeah there’s ways to think about
    how to go beyond that but certainly as
    long as we’re satisfied that the state
    is the most
    efficient social entity to prevent chaos
    that we’re going to be stuck with this
    notion of National Security centered on
    state survivability State
    sustain yeah I’m really interesting um
    you know point that uh this the state at
    least has some responsibility to its
    citizens um but chaos there’s no
    responsibility take a you know the
    panoply of the Second Amendment that’s
    chaos and it’s not the same as the state
    controlling things but that’s another
    another show another time I want to I
    want to ask you one more thing this came
    up I I I meant to mention it and that is
    a couple of weeks ago there was a very
    chilling segment on 60 Minutes about
    mines in Ukraine the Russians have been
    dropping mines uh planting mines against
    tanks and dropping mines from airplanes
    um by the millions okay it’s going to
    take a long time to get rid of all those
    mines but one of the kinds of Mines that
    they Dro and and this was this is fellow
    who’s heading his garden in front of his
    house it’s a perfectly Eastern European
    kind of thing and he’s got all his
    flowers growing okay one day the the
    Russian plane flies over and drops these
    little little grein mines they’re 5 in
    long they’re painted green you can’t see
    them in foliage you can’t see them um
    and if you step on them you lose your
    leg um okay and by the medat all over
    now some of them will fail some of them
    will get old and rust but a lot of them
    will be there forever and and what
    happened is the guy went out into his
    garden um going to do his roses that day
    and he he saw the mines come down and he
    pulled out 12 of them from his front
    garden but he didn’t see the 13
    and lost his leg now these mines are
    going to be in eastern Ukraine for a
    long long time it’ll you know to to to
    take out one significant mind takes a
    Ukrainian like a full day of of working
    ever so carefully to remove it um this
    is going to affect the future of that
    country mines have a life and after L um
    it’s a special kind of weapon it’s
    completely irresponsible if you if you
    scatter them among civilian populations
    that way your
    thoughts yeah mine well I mean that’s
    why there there was uh success what back
    in the 90s uh I guess with the with the
    anti-mine movement that they actually
    managed to ban anti-personnel mines
    unfortunately uh it wasn’t all
    completely successful because they’re
    still out there you know and and they’re
    they’re in Korea too you know if you
    ever if you ever have a ification on the
    Korean Peninsula there’s going to be
    people poking around in the DMZ for a
    long time trying to find all those
    anti-personnel mines on you know so so
    yeah I mean it’s it’s it’s it’s sad and
    it’s horrible that people are still
    using that kind of a weapon but the fact
    is is they’re still out there and uh
    again you know it’s a it’s a fact of
    it’s a fact of life that that those
    those weapons are still sitting there
    they’re still going to kill people and
    uh it take decades to get rid of it as
    you
    say well thanks for this discussion Carl
    pry
    sure I’m not I’m not sure that it helps
    me feel better about
    anything but but that’s the reality and
    and we like to talk about the reality
    really appreciate it coming down and
    discussing these these very unhappy
    unhappy developments in the in the the
    human race yeah it really it really is a
    not a not a pleasant topic you know and
    and the reality is is that they’re there
    and and we have got gotten a long way to
    go before we stop talking about it when
    we have countries around the world in as
    you say increasing their defense budget
    for the in the name of of National
    Security yeah and then we have a
    terrible horrible disastrous war and
    people make a agreements that it would
    never happen again uh no more poison gas
    no more uh you know uh biological
    warfare and all that stuff no more
    nuclear proliferation and next time you
    look we forgot all that and we’re back
    to square
    one well thank you Carl Carl Baker
    senior advisor at the Pacific for white
    always enjoy these discussions and I
    learned so much thank you than you and
    [Music]
    aloha we want to announce that think
    Tech Hawaii is moving into a new phase
    and will not be producing regular talk
    shows after April 30th we will retain
    our website and YouTube channel and will
    accept new content on an ad hoc basis we
    are also developing a legacy archive
    program to provide continuing public
    access to our content if you can help us
    cover the costs of the transition and
    the development of our Legacy archive
    program please make a donation on think
    techa away.com
    thanks so much aloha
    [Music]

    How will They Change Wars in the Future. The host for this show is Jay Fidell. The guest is Carl Baker.

    Carl Baker, senior advisor to Pacific Forum, helps us understand the new weapons and battlefield techniques that have been used or developed in the Russia-Ukraine War and the Israel-Hamas war, and now the war between Israel and Iran, including missiles, drones, glide bombs, gliders, land mines, laser beams, smart assault weapons, helicopter boardings, among other things, and how they are likely to change wars in the future.

    The ThinkTech YouTube Playlist for this show is https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLQpkwcNJny6mHEEOF0uG_ZWaKXVlH7Wn9

    Please visit our ThinkTech website at https://thinktechhawaii.com and see our Think Tech Advisories at https://thinktechadvisories.blogspot.com.

    Check out www.ThinkTechHawaii.com for great content and great community.

    Our vision is to be a leader in shaping a more vital and thriving Hawaii as the foundation for future generations. Our mission is to be the leading digital media platform raising public awareness and promoting civic engagement in Hawaii.

    ThinkTech Hawaii is a Hawaii Non-Profit Corporation:

    President and CEO – Jay Fidell
    Executive VP and COO – Carol Mon Lee
    Administration Manager – Maria Sabio

    ThinkTech treats this video as licensed under a creative commons license, and invites the public to view, distribute, disseminate and share it under the terms of that license.

    The information in this video is not to be relied upon as legal, medical, accounting or other professional advice. For legal, medical, accounting or any other advice, please consult with your own professionals.

    The views and opinions expressed by the hosts and guests in this video are their own and do not necessarily represent the views and opinions of ThinkTech, its management or staff or other organizations with which our hosts and guests are associated.

    1 Comment

    Leave A Reply
    Share via