Oil, gas and mining

RUSSIA – USA Accused of BOMBING Nord Stream Pipelines by Planting Explosives 3 Months in Advance



Please Support The Channel:
YouTube Super Thanks (click below)
YouTube Membership (click below)
https://www.buymeacoffee.com/JoeBlogs
https://www.patreon.com/joeblogsYT

The NORD STREAM Pipelines constructed by Russia to supply Natural Gas to Germany supplied around 60 BILLION CUBIC METERS of Gas to every year, equating to around 40% of all of the Gas Imported by Germany. LEAKS in the pipeline were reported in September 2022 following EXPLOSIONS and a new report has ACCUSED the USA of planning and executing these these. In this video I provide details of the accusations, look at the evidence and discuss whether it is likely that the USA was behind these Explosions.

For specific details please check out the CHAPTER list below.

Thanks for watching and please LIKE and SUBSCRIBE.

If you like this video and are would like to buy me a coffee please click the link below. THANK YOU it is very much appreciated.

https://www.buymeacoffee.com/JoeBlogs

Chapters:
0:00 Intro
2:35 NORDSTREAM PIPELINES
3:52 NORDSTREAM EXPLOSIONS
5:05 USA ACCUSED
10:22 SEYMOUR HERSH
11:57 SUMMARY & CONCLUSION

#UKRAINE
#russia
#nordstream
#GAS
#POLAND
#GLOBALFINANCIALCRISIS
#RUBLE
#SWIFT
#RECESSION
#CHINA
#USA
#NATO
#WW3
#WORLDWAR3

24 Comments

  1. Which is then most likely, you ask yourself? That this is a voluntary and conscientious leak or a fabricated tip to the good Seymour from some person who profited greatly from delivering it. So fitting that Seymour Hersh got hold of this material. Too good to be true don't you think? Quite a coincidence! Or can we assume that if this proves anything at all, it proves why the Kremlin did it at all. It really is a perfect piece of disinformation material if only it gets into the right hands. If so, we can only congratulate the Kremlin that someone legitimate fell into the trap. It really goes hand in hand with the Great Russian narrative we all know so well by now. We must remember that the gas price was expected to rise in Russia's favor and that there were still gas pipelines from elsewhere (e.g. Ukraine) and that at this time the Kremlin still had high hopes of winning over Ukraine and that Europe would be frozen to the knees and become disunited and weakened for the winter to come. The Kremlin has already proven it themselves that they intend to destroy infrastructure to get what they want. Power for themselves and subjugation for the opponents. How much more proof do we want? Think about it for a while but not too long.

  2. Great reporting Joe!

    The only thing that I would add is that this act of blowing up the Nord stream pipeline by whoever the culprit is, is seen in the by all nations in the UN all around the globe as a terrorist Act and an act of War.

    The pipeline was 51% owned by Russia and 41% owned by Germany. Germany has an investment here and Germany is also part of NATO. Under Article 5 of the NATO treaty states, “an armed attack against one or more of them in Europe or North America shall be considered an attack against them all.”

    If Russia was found to be guilty, this would have already started a war between NATO and Russia. Switzerland and the Danish has evidence of who sabotaged the pipeline but has not inform the public of their findings in their investigation.

    If the United States sabotage the pipeline, then this is an act of war against Germany and the NATO Alliance would all need to defend Germany against the United States terrorist Act.

    https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2022/10/is_there_proof_that_the_uk_and_us_sabotaged_the_nord_stream_pipeline.html

  3. My money is still on some Russian underling presenting this daft scheme to Putin as a means of applying pressure to Europe, given underlying engineering considerations. Shortly afterwards Danish experts asserted that each such explosion generated seismic events comparable to 0.5kt – ie. ~500kg of trinitrotoluene, not the 100kg or so Joe cites.
    Such a swag of bangstuff was thought most easily delivered using the internal pipe crawlers used for maintenance – and those are sent from the Russian termini.

  4. Biden's foreign policy strikes me as cautious, sometimes to a fault. It's reported that he was skeptical of the Bin Laden raid, as it was too risky. This claim just doesn't seem to fit with his character.

  5. The USA cannot handle the 'success' of Europe, in every single way they are making life difficult for a far better community developing in the Old World, where the poor are accepted and supported, where public facilities are excellent, where many political parties thrive rather than just 2 parties slugging it out every 4 years, where technological development for the masses is nurtured, THE USA EMPIRE IS RAPIDLY CRUMBLING AND WANTS TO TAKE EUROPE DOWN WITH IT!

  6. There are military planes headed to and from the area both before and after the seismic events. People just can’t seem to find or report if from the tech censorship going on. Monkey Werx covers the relevant flight data and others in Europe should have the same data.

  7. You are in denial or very dumb. Biden threatened to do disable them!! Why would Russia blow them up when they can just turn off the pumps. Obvious that it’s the USA. Conspiracy truth, just like the Biden laptop was conspiracy fact

  8. That's the price of being a client and vassal state. You will be humiliated and abused by the master at will. The master will tell you what to and what not to do, if you defy you pay the price. If they told you no to buy cheap gas and buy their expensive gas, if you say no then consequences will follow.Apart from economic costs, this is humiliating for the Germans. No matter how your alliance partners disagree with you but destroying you infrastructure is deeply humiliating.

  9. No mention of the obvious (and easily answerable) question following the Swedish and Danish investigations: Were the explosions from within or without the pipes?

  10. Joe's remark eight minutes on the back story does some terrific time compression. I should mention he is directly quoting Hersh's article, but sometimes out of context. This unfortunately gives the impression that Biden was responsible for Ivy Bells. Without paying close attention one might think these were current events. Being fair to Mr Hersh, his original article makes it very clear such cable-tapping operations were way back in the Cold War, not ending till 1980.

  11. I liked Joe Blog's because of his handle of hard facts, here however he is seems to have lost a grip of the actual timeline,.
    claiming the Germans were still buying gas when the truth is the pipelines weren't working. That the US would dare commit an an act that could escalate into a nuclear confrontation eludes plain common sense.

  12. If you go back to Biden speeches he told the world they were going to start the gas pipeline. Don’t care if it releases massive greenhouse gas. NATO is the evil organization that don’t care what damages are done as long as they get something out of it.

  13. I have to remark the bizzare stance of the report cited at 7:00, like RTR was in the editing room. Just see here: "From its earliest days, Nord Stream 1 was seen by Washington and its anti-Russian NATO partners as a threat to western dominance. " Really ? western dominance ? not free will of the eastern europe ex soviet states to choose ? if this is the language was used in "hersh" paper, we have to strongly seek "kompromat" evidence…Even if, by chance, Usa did it, the explanation is taken directly from Kremlin propaganda.

  14. 2 problems here. !, Washington is a hive of parties engaging in 'poison pen" campaigns by acting as 'reliable sources' for journalists. And Biden recently seems to be the target of some groups.
    2, the Russians did have motives to blow up the pipeline. Gazprom's contract fined them for failure to deliver product unless by an act of god. And they had shut down supply Sept. 2, 2022. The explosions got them off the hook. Also, Putin has repeatedly used shutting down gas and oil to punish the Europeans. Causing political mayhem in Germany by totally shutting down their gas supply could have split Germany from NATO and helped him win the War. And he still has the pipelines through Turkey.

  15. Joe, are you well??

    Your; face, lips and neck look like you’re severely Dehydrated.. ?!

    It is really important that you did a report on this new, hot issue.

    Thank you.

    My take on Seymour Hersh’s article?

    This is not a conspiracy theory. It’s a plausibly accurate account.

    #1, Seymour Hersh, a Legend in US Military investigating reporting For DECADES.

    He has Numerous bigtime awards for his work.

    #2, Blowing up Nord Stream, After it was Shutdown, was such a dumb-assed move that Only the FSB/RUS military would Think of it.

    FSB false flag thumbprints All over it!? right?

    Cut off their nose, to win the internal RUS PR campaign; ‘Look The West is Attacking RUS!’

    #3, The US CIA is a really smart group, BUT they have done some Despicable Dumb-Assed, Military opps in the past; 1980s opps in Central America, multicontinental, black site water torture 1990s, and More.

    #4, The Informed take of a previous member of US Homeland Security is that Hersh's reporting on the ramp-up to the CIA op 'Smells' like a bureaucratic, US Intel op.

    ’Walks like a duck. Quacks like a duck.’ Right?

    This is not a conspiracy theory. It’s a very plausible accurate account.

    Yeah, Hersh is 80yo, and has been duped in the past by sources.

    Given all That; I say ‘this is a conspiracy theory’ by Joe, is facile and unfair.

    The Sweds did a Thorough investigation, and Know who did it, and didn't tell. HuH.

    Joe glossed over That. 🙂

  16. First of all, Russia had been stepping down supply and increasing the heat for some months and eventually stopped the gas export before the pipelines were blown up. If the Russians wanted to make another point it was what happened and also state that we can get to all your pipelines. The excuse was problems with compressors and getting these services in the west. All permissions had long been given without the Russians making any action to actually start the claimed necessary repairs.
    Second, consider Putin wanted to prevent the motive for someone to overthrow him and restore relations and money flow from the west.
    Third, claiming the US would have much to loos from it coming out is insignificant compared to the risk Norway would be running in being involved. Norway lives by being a reliable energy supplier to Europe in the long run, to risk this relationship would be highly short-sighted, particularly since Europe already was buying all the gas Norway could supply at very high prices. And taking out an already closed pipeline did little to the gas price.

  17. Although I would agree that Russia has the most to loose by bombing their own pipeline so any such decision from the Kremlin would be strategically/tactically flawed, illogical or irrational; we have to keep in mind that this entire war has demonstrated that Russia will do strategically/tactically flawed, illogical or irrational things to forward their agenda.

    Just because Russia has the most to loose, does not mean that they would not try to do it.

Write A Comment

Share via