Oil, gas and mining

How reliable is Hersh's Nord Stream allegation?



For more:
https://www.cgtn.com/video

The White House has denied investigative journalist Seymour Hersh’s claim that the United States was behind the #NordStream gas pipeline explosions. Between Hersh and the U.S. government, who do you believe? Listen to the views of Professor Josef Gregory Mahoney from East China Normal University and Zhao Hai from the National Institute for Global Strategy.

Subscribe to us on YouTube: https://goo.gl/lP12gA
Download our APP on Apple Store (iOS): https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/cctvnews-app/id922456579?l=zh&ls=1&mt=8
Download our APP on Google Play (Android): https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.imib.cctv

20 Comments

  1. There is absofuckinglutely no doubt that Biden is behind that awful eco-terroristic act of sabotage. Who leads the train in the Collective West? Which Country could have done that without the Emperor's consent?

  2. I believe Hersh about Bin Laden. When he broke the Mai Lai Massacre story, which he won a Pulitzer for, they tried to discredit his reporting. But the truth came out. Times are different now though. The media is fully in bed with the security state, and they will NEVER admit he was right about Bin Laden, or this Nordstream story

  3. Looking at the photos the pipes seem to have a slight belling which would

    indicate an internal explosion. Only Russia could have accomplished that.

    Blowing up the pipes would prevent Germany from getting use out of near

    by sections for other projects.

  4. What happened to the bomb(s) that didn't go off? One pipe survived, so either the evidence is still there or it has been removed by someone, which is a process that might leave some evidence of its own. Why haven't we heard anything about this? Has Germany inspected the remaining pipe? Has Russia?

  5. Seymore Hersh does not speculate.
    He talked to government officials, he collects the data, the facts, he put them all together then report on what he found.

    For this NS attack, he spoke to Biden, Sollavant, Blinken, and Newland. The data came from these officials. He also talked to Norway officials.

    Edit: all 4 of the abovee tiomed officials have not made any statement rejecting Hersh's report. They also have not appear in public.
    Their actions spoke louder than words.

  6. The first guest to speak in this video clip either didn't know or intentionally mislead the audience.

    Pakistan government was protecting Bin Laden at the time. CIA didn't know where he was. It was a retired Pakistani official who walked into the USA embassy and told them where to find Bin Laden.
    Pakistan was not keeping Bin Laden as prisoner.

    Hersh reported the Pakistani retired officials walked into USA embassy and gave away Bin Laden's location.

    USA government and their Medias bragged it was their CIA intelligent who single handedly discovered and assissimated Bin Laden.

    Pakistan later confirmed Hersh version to be correct.

    On top of this, Sept 11 attack was carried out by a group of Saudi.
    They were not Afghan.

  7. I'm pretty sure it's very reliable considering the MSM completely ignored and suppressed it.
    People think this is normal, but to Russia who knows that it was the U.S, that was a direct declaration of war against them. They are mobilizing in preparation for a 30 months war against NATO.

  8. c'mon… if so, this was agreed even by Germans – they're infiltrated by russians, so this gambit sort of solved their decision making problems. remember their ex-chancelor still being CEO of Gazprom (owner of Nordstream)?

  9. Relying on anonymus sources of information does not necessarily mean the information is not true, nor does it discredit the journalist conveying it, especially when there is additional evidence to support it.

  10. How did Seymour Hersh got all that insider info and data?

    Knowing how secret operations work I can assure you that not too many officers are aware of all the details.

    The impressive detail and the wide knowledge of the operation contained in Hersh’s article tells us that it could only be provided by a high rank officer who would know all the details of such an operation.

    Therefore we can assume that if in fact a high rank officer in the US Pentagon told Hersh all the details, the Pentagon knows already who this high rank officer is.

    I think it is safe to assume that it is almost impossible for any high rank officer in the Pentagon to divulge such information of a recent top secret operation.

    What I really think it happened is that Seymour Hersh made it all up.

Write A Comment

Share via